• The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

The funny way Impey avoided a doping ban

What's so crazy about the Impey decision - Impey provided solid information that showed contamination of his medicine which convinced the Anti-Doping Tribunal - And if WADA was concerned about the decision then they would have appealed.
 
Re:

yaco said:
What's so crazy about the Impey decision - Impey provided solid information that showed contamination of his medicine which convinced the Anti-Doping Tribunal - And if WADA was concerned about the decision then they would have appealed.

And how probable is it that a pharmacist BY MISTAKE adds an illegal substance to the stuff that a professional bikerider has ordenes?

Just look at all the other impropable excuses we've heard about beefs and unborn twins through the years.
 
Re: Re:

Danskebjerge said:
yaco said:
What's so crazy about the Impey decision - Impey provided solid information that showed contamination of his medicine which convinced the Anti-Doping Tribunal - And if WADA was concerned about the decision then they would have appealed.

And how probable is it that a pharmacist BY MISTAKE adds an illegal substance to the stuff that a professional bikerider has ordenes?

Just look at all the other impropable excuses we've heard about beefs and unborn twins through the years.

The difference is that the pharmacist testified at the Anti-Doping Tribunal - Improbable excuses are when you have no evidence to support your assertion.
 

TRENDING THREADS