The Hour Record attempt by Jens Voigt (18.09.2014)

Page 7 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

What will happen?

  • Vino (he will beat Boardman's superman 56 km)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .
richwagmn said:
Absolutely understand. Jens didn't make the rules. He certainly won't keep the record. Give the man his due. That was hard as ****.

Yeah, no question about that.

happytramp, maybe some want a way to compare performances across time? You could know definitively who beats Merckx, not just slips through the air better depending on the rules of the day. I realize that gets kind of weird, "What's Jensie doing on that old bike?" But, I can see the appeal.

Again, I don't care either way. This attempt kicks off a number of attempts over the next few years.
 
Jun 18, 2009
2,078
2
0
DirtyWorks said:
Yeah, no question about that.

happytramp, maybe some want a way to compare performances across time? You could know definitively who beats Merckx, not just slips through the air better depending on the rules of the day. I realize that gets kind of weird, "What's Jensie doing on that old bike?" But, I can see the appeal.

Again, I don't care either way. This attempt kicks off a number of attempts over the next few years.

And that's the best part of this. I really wonder what Tony Martin or Brad Wiggins could do?
 
happytramp said:
Merck should have done it on a Penny Farthing to see if he could have beaten the original record holder etc, etc.


on a "streamliner" to see if he could beat the 49.922km of Berthet, etc, etc.


The "record" on a penny farthing invoked by the commentators is not even an official record. Merckx's bike is pretty comparable to Desgrange's one. Closer to Desgrange's bike than to Berthet's ...
 
Echoes said:
Merckx's bike is pretty comparable to Desgrange's one. Closer to Desgrange's bike than to Berthet's ...

The point really is that you can't force these guys to take on a record attempt on a bike that they haven't spent years adjusting to. Sure you could throw Tony Martin onto an old steel bike but the result is probably not going to be a fair reflection of his ability. I think we probably just have to accept that there's always going to be changes in the record rules (unless UCI really believe that there will be no more allowable advancements in the field of TT bike design)
 
Echoes said:
Anyway RIP Hour Record (1893-2014) :(

yes. because the hour record was still alive between 1996 and 2014 lol:rolleyes:
that's why you had only a semi-retired boardman and a soviet anonymous beast sosenka going for it in 20 years.

welcome back to life to the hour record i'd say,
i really hope sosenka will give a try in the spring, he should beat this if he has an ego.
i do expect fabian and wiggo to go above 54 km, only slower to rominger's best and boardman's.
anyway, very nice evening, enjoyed it!
 
Sep 25, 2009
7,527
1
0
the old man jens was magnificent.

but only an ignorant fan can think that he beat any previous record.

still, good to see jens setting the mark according to new rules...until the uci gets another brain fart.
 
For me Boardman still holds the record at 56.375km

hour23.jpg
 
happytramp said:
The point really is that you can't force these guys to take on a record attempt on a bike that they haven't spent years adjusting to.

They are racing on traditional bikes in every "in line" road races. The rules should never be adapted to the whims of pseudo stars. They have to adapt to the rules.

jens_attacks said:
yes. because the hour record was still alive between 1996 and 2014 lol

Definitely alive. Boardman was the hell of a great rider. His 2000 performance was epic. He was liquified after that. Besides he still had good ITT results in 2000. And sure, Voigt was not semi-retired, lol.

Edit: and forgot to mention that Cancellara was preparing for a TRUE hour record, before Cookson killed it.

del1962 said:
For me Boardman still holds the record at 49.441km

Fixed.
 
Echoes said:
Definitely alive. Boardman was the hell of a great rider. His 2000 performance was epic. He was liquified after that. Besides he still had good ITT results in 2000.

yes it was so epic that 80% of the peloton of those times could do it too...nobody gave a shiit except legendary freacking sosenka. nobody wants to ride on those dumb, ancient bikes. and rightfully so.

fabian in my opinion is the man who made cookson change the rules anyway
 
Jun 18, 2009
2,078
2
0
jens_attacks said:
yes it was so epic that 80% of the peloton of those times could do it too...nobody gave a shiit except legendary freacking sosenka. nobody wants to ride on those dumb, ancient bikes. and rightfully so.

fabian in my opinion is the man who made cookson change the rules anyway

Because... Fabian would have beat Merckx's record?
 
jens_attacks said:
yes it was so epic that 80% of the peloton of those times could do it too...nobody gave a shiit except legendary freacking sosenka. nobody wants to ride on those dumb, ancient bikes. and rightfully so.

They were pussies !! bar Boardman.

Besides Thomas Liese also made an attempt, and others too. That's why the pseudo stars of the time were pussies, period.
jens_attacks said:
fabian in my opinion is the man who made cookson change the rules anyway

Your opinion does not matter. The facts matter. Cancellara wanted to break the TRUE Hour record and was not interested in the Hour travesty that we have witnessed today. Only Trek is forcing him, as usual.
 
Jancouver said:
Fabian: 54 Km
Wigo: 55 Km
Martin: 57 Km

i highly doubt anyone can beat even rominger's 55.200 or whatever, forget boardman. also martin with his cadence is really not suited to the track i guess.

wiggo with his best preparation(probably one year only for this) can get close to 55 km
 
Echoes said:
...........
Boardman was the hell of a great rider. His 2000 performance was epic. He was liquified after that. Besides he still had good ITT results in 2000....

So you are unaware that Boardman 2000 was way inferior to Boardman 1996.

In 2000 he only produced about 403 watts to cover his 49.441 km

while in 1996

he needed 442 watts to cover 56.375 km.

In other words, Boardman 1996 would have covered about 51.100 km on a pseudo-Merckx style bike.

Over 2 hours he could probably have done 100 km on that 2000 "Merckx" bike if he had been in the same shape as in 1996.
 
Buffalo Soldier said:
For me it's clear: rebuild Merckx's bike. Same material, same rims, same pedals. Merckx is THE standard. Everything compares to him. Why not even make it A standard. Like "I do the hour in 1.23 Merckx, how about you?"...

(Of course his time will be beaten, they still run marathons on rubber shoes, but always faster)

Merckx's hour bike didn't meet the UCI's "Merckx-hour" bike regulations.