Dr. Maserati said:Genuine answer - people should be compensated appropriatley, and work in a safe and healthy environment.
But when you look at the charity (which keeps being referred to a for-profit entity called Livestrong) expences it is easy to see that it is not be spent appropriatley.
$5 million of the $35 million raised goes on wages - here are some of the roles and renumeration of its top executives...... for a charity!
Doug E. Ulman - President - $285,000
Betty S Otter-Nickerson - COO - $213,122
Philippe G. Hills - EVP Development - $293,200
Greg D.Lee - CFO - $162,942.
Morgan L. Binswanger - Chief of Staff - 191,935
John A. Miller - EVP Mission - $145,396
Melissa Douthit - EVP Advocacy & Engageme $124,010
Mona Patel - EVP People & Organisation - $119,193
Katherine A. McLane - Highly Compensated Employee- $114,060
Ronald A. Kolenic - Highly Compensated Employee - $109,212
Lets, for arguments sake, say that Doug E Ulman is fantastic at his job.
His abilities should return his salary back to the organisation many times over. Pay someone half of that, to a candidate who has half his ability and it suddenly seems like a poor choice.
If you want to staff a multi million dollar organisation with people capable of running such an organisation, you probably have to pay the market rate.
300k for such a role is par for the course.
Disclaimer - Doug E Ulman is not related to me and may well be a sh*tkicker.