- Jul 13, 2012
- 59
- 0
- 0
KayLow said:his primary beef with Armstrong is that Armstrong failed to fund a bike shop consistent with the terms of an informal email agreement that Anderson no longer possesses. Not only does this have nothing to do with doping, but it also makes Anderson look more than a little foolish. I do not think a reasonable person would reach an informal agreement to fund a bike shop with terms no more specific than "yeah, I will help you start up a shop when the time comes."
I think his primary beef now is that, when he tried to reasonably negotiate the terms by which he might sign a non-disclosure with Armstrong after being fired by Armstrong, Armstrong sued him for extortion to attempt to (a) paint him in such a bad light that it didn't matter what he ever said about him in public and (b) bankrupt the poor guy. Its not evidence of doping, but its evidence of something arguably worse.