- May 29, 2019
- 9,673
- 10,488
- 18,180
@Unchained
Whatever problem you approach in a more scientific and methodical way, at minimum including statistics and the time needed to understand the underlying system involved, after start to implement measures, results are always different. If the measures implemented are effective.
So the idea only cycling can for ever and ever remain the same, statistically and is some regard, that is on what indeed not only cycling fans but more importantly governing bodies would like to sell. Why? As it's the easiest thing to do, requires no effort whatsoever.
A good example was once this approach was used to determine on how many safety orientated issues are cyclists fault. It turned out it's around 30%. Before that it was generally accepted, by fandom, it's close to 100%. And AFAIK this study wasn't done by UCI.
Crazy.
Whatever problem you approach in a more scientific and methodical way, at minimum including statistics and the time needed to understand the underlying system involved, after start to implement measures, results are always different. If the measures implemented are effective.
So the idea only cycling can for ever and ever remain the same, statistically and is some regard, that is on what indeed not only cycling fans but more importantly governing bodies would like to sell. Why? As it's the easiest thing to do, requires no effort whatsoever.
A good example was once this approach was used to determine on how many safety orientated issues are cyclists fault. It turned out it's around 30%. Before that it was generally accepted, by fandom, it's close to 100%. And AFAIK this study wasn't done by UCI.
Crazy.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram