Teams & Riders The "MVP" Mathieu Van der Poel Road Discussion Thread

Page 23 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Feb 20, 2019
324
28
1,330
Welp, the timing to praise his bike-handling skills couldn’t have been any worse. Never seen him struggle like this although he does take more risks on the bike because he’s such a great bike-handler. Today he just took too much of a risk which honestly might have cost him a podium spot or even the win. Shame. So so strong today, what a difference one week can make like he said himself after Ghent-Wevelgem. Would have loved to see him in PR with this form...
 
I rewatched a bit of his comeback more closely and during the race, it looked more impressive to me than it was. There were actually a lot of dead moments in the bunch when he was off the back. After the penultimate Kwaremont he also had two team mates (Devolder and Vermeersch I think) that helped him out.

Obviously he lost quite some energy there but I wouldn't say for sure that he was the strongest guy in the race.
 
Feb 20, 2019
324
28
1,330
Re:

Flamin said:
I rewatched a bit of his comeback more closely and during the race, it looked more impressive to me than it was. There were actually a lot of dead moments in the bunch when he was off the back. After the penultimate Kwaremont he also had two team mates (Devolder and Vermeersch I think) that helped him out.

Obviously he lost quite some energy there but I wouldn't say for sure that he was the strongest guy in the race.

I’m quite certain he was when you add up everything. Taking a tumble, shaking it off, using up more energy than he had to compared to the other favorites in order to get back to the group, probably riding with some pain or discomfort, and even then being badly positioned still ascended the Paterberg the quickest out of the group and even dropped them at the very top. He had a gap at the top and shortly after there was a gap between him and the group and you could see he wanted to ride on but no one was able to go with him. Shame. Definitely one of the strongest if not THE strongest all things considered imo.
 
Re:

Flamin said:
I rewatched a bit of his comeback more closely and during the race, it looked more impressive to me than it was. There were actually a lot of dead moments in the bunch when he was off the back. After the penultimate Kwaremont he also had two team mates (Devolder and Vermeersch I think) that helped him out.

Obviously he lost quite some energy there but I wouldn't say for sure that he was the strongest guy in the race.
Lol. Then you should buy glasses.

He was riding tempo. If you overdo it you cook yourselfs. And what he did on especially the Koppenberg and Taaienberg was impressive. For a hill he hates he might have gone quickest, weaving through the group. And soloing in between. Even the Trek DS-es were impressed
 
Re: Re:

Dekker_Tifosi said:
Flamin said:
I rewatched a bit of his comeback more closely and during the race, it looked more impressive to me than it was. There were actually a lot of dead moments in the bunch when he was off the back. After the penultimate Kwaremont he also had two team mates (Devolder and Vermeersch I think) that helped him out.

Obviously he lost quite some energy there but I wouldn't say for sure that he was the strongest guy in the race.
Lol. Then you should buy glasses.

He was riding tempo. If you overdo it you cook yourselfs. And what he did on especially the Koppenberg and Taaienberg was impressive. For a hill he hates he might have gone quickest, weaving through the group. And soloing in between. Even the Trek DS-es were impressed

Buy glasses for what? You're going to deny the tempo dropped completely on numerous occasions? He was never alone on the parts between the climbs. On the climbs itself, he obviously had to do it himself but on Pater and Koppenberg it's every man for himself anyway.

Where did I say he wasn't impressive? I just meant he was also heavily favoured by the circumstances and that I'm not convinced he was the strongest in the race, and for that matter, could have followed Bettiol on Kwaremont). Even the Trek-DS were impressed? What kind of argument is that? Everyone was but that's totally besides the point.
 
Re:

eric_vv said:
Apparently Matthieu only knew Bettiol was ahead at 5 km from the finish. He didn't see him go, he was too far back because he started too far back. He was that far back because he felt good enough to move up if needed. A rookie mistake, but that's one he probably won't make again.

No idea if he would have been able to follow Bettiol, but would have loved to see him try.

https://www.nu.nl/wielrennen/5831208/van-der-poel-heb-beslissende-demarrage-bettiol-niet-gezien.html

He thinks he could. A real pity (but also quite inexcusable, even for a first-timer).

It would have made the finish more interesting. This is the fifth year in a row that we knew the name of the winner at the top of the Paterberg.
 
Feb 20, 2019
324
28
1,330
Re: Re:

tobydawq said:
eric_vv said:
Apparently Matthieu only knew Bettiol was ahead at 5 km from the finish. He didn't see him go, he was too far back because he started too far back. He was that far back because he felt good enough to move up if needed. A rookie mistake, but that's one he probably won't make again.

No idea if he would have been able to follow Bettiol, but would have loved to see him try.

https://www.nu.nl/wielrennen/5831208/van-der-poel-heb-beslissende-demarrage-bettiol-niet-gezien.html

He thinks he could. A real pity (but also quite inexcusable, even for a first-timer).

It would have made the finish more interesting. This is the fifth year in a row that we knew the name of the winner at the top of the Paterberg.

It wouldn't have been much more interesting if Mathieu went with Bettiol imo, I think we would have known the winner in that case as well. Mathieu finished 2nd in the bunch sprint just after Kristoff. He would have definitely relied on his sprint, and given his form I doubt Bettiol would have dropped him en route to the finish. Oh well, that's if's, maybe's, and probably's... :eek:
 
Re: Re:

Mavic said:
tobydawq said:
eric_vv said:
Apparently Matthieu only knew Bettiol was ahead at 5 km from the finish. He didn't see him go, he was too far back because he started too far back. He was that far back because he felt good enough to move up if needed. A rookie mistake, but that's one he probably won't make again.

No idea if he would have been able to follow Bettiol, but would have loved to see him try.

https://www.nu.nl/wielrennen/5831208/van-der-poel-heb-beslissende-demarrage-bettiol-niet-gezien.html

He thinks he could. A real pity (but also quite inexcusable, even for a first-timer).

It would have made the finish more interesting. This is the fifth year in a row that we knew the name of the winner at the top of the Paterberg.

It wouldn't have been much more interesting if Mathieu went with Bettiol imo, I think we would have known the winner in that case as well. Mathieu finished 2nd in the bunch sprint just after Kristoff. He would have definitely relied on his sprint, and given his form I doubt Bettiol would have dropped him en route to the finish. Oh well, that's if's, maybe's, and probably's... :eek:

You're right, I thought about that when writing the other post. But I don't think it would have been as pre-determined as the Kristoff-Terpstra sprint of 2015.
 

Eli

Feb 23, 2018
145
14
2,860
Re: Re:

tobydawq said:
Mavic said:
tobydawq said:
eric_vv said:
Apparently Matthieu only knew Bettiol was ahead at 5 km from the finish. He didn't see him go, he was too far back because he started too far back. He was that far back because he felt good enough to move up if needed. A rookie mistake, but that's one he probably won't make again.

No idea if he would have been able to follow Bettiol, but would have loved to see him try.

https://www.nu.nl/wielrennen/5831208/van-der-poel-heb-beslissende-demarrage-bettiol-niet-gezien.html

He thinks he could. A real pity (but also quite inexcusable, even for a first-timer).

It would have made the finish more interesting. This is the fifth year in a row that we knew the name of the winner at the top of the Paterberg.

It wouldn't have been much more interesting if Mathieu went with Bettiol imo, I think we would have known the winner in that case as well. Mathieu finished 2nd in the bunch sprint just after Kristoff. He would have definitely relied on his sprint, and given his form I doubt Bettiol would have dropped him en route to the finish. Oh well, that's if's, maybe's, and probably's... :eek:

You're right, I thought about that when writing the other post. But I don't think it would have been as pre-determined as the Kristoff-Terpstra sprint of 2015.

Oh yes it would have. I would literally eat my own shyte if Bettilol beats Mathieu in a two man sprint.
 
Feb 20, 2019
324
28
1,330
Re: Re:

Blanco said:
Logic-is-your-friend said:
Red Rick said:
Now I'm interested for the Brabantse Pijl and Amstel. One can only hope he does a bigger road program next year.
Brabantse pijl is almost a guaranteed win.

I don't know, Wellens is riding there...

Good point. Wellens is a shoo-in in those types of races. Mathieu will definitely be up there though.
 
Re: Re:

Blanco said:
Logic-is-your-friend said:
Red Rick said:
Now I'm interested for the Brabantse Pijl and Amstel. One can only hope he does a bigger road program next year.
Brabantse pijl is almost a guaranteed win.

I don't know, Wellens is riding there...
Still. Wellens would need to go from far. And gaps at BP are always small.It's a typical "MVDP" race, a playground.
 
Just an insane classics talent. If he doesnt crash today, he wins this bike race Im pretty sure. Will probably even be the biggest favourite for Amstel. After just watching 3-4 road races of Mathieu (Gent, Dwaars, Flanders and EC) I can say he is the bigger talent than Van Aert on the road (dont know about XC or mountainbike) which you probably wouldn't expect given Aert focuses more on the road than him.

Im curious to what whether he can win races like Roubaix or Liege in the future. San-Remo, Strade, Flanders (all the flemish classics and G-W included), Amstel etc. should fit him very well. Guess he never will contend for Wallone and Lombardia, but I guess someone who know him a lot more than me can tell me that given I don't pay jackshit attention to other than road racing.
 
Likely, but I don't know for sure that's it's too hard, especially with the new finish. It might depend on how it's raced. I mean, Matthews has finished 4th recently. The one I'd say that suits him the least is MSR. I think it would be way too boring for him. No way I can see him just sitting in the bunch for 250k+.
 
Re: Re:

Logic-is-your-friend said:
Still. Wellens would need to go from far. And gaps at BP are always small.It's a typical "MVDP" race, a playground.
Yeah, but everyone knows this and will try to adapt their strategy. Mathieu doesn't have a strong team to control a race.