Re: Re:
tobydawq said:
But he is lighter than Van Aert (I hope I didn't step anybody too hard on their toes for comparing the two unprovokedly) and thus has more potential than him in the Ardennes classics.
I'm keeping tabs.
According to their own claims, they shouldn't differ that much in weight atm. When during the winter Van Aert was said to weigh close to 80kg, Mathieu said he wasn't far behind (but never specified). But a few weeks ago, Van Aert said he currently only weighs 77.4kg (at MSR). It's probably (at the moment) not too much of a difference between them. I do think Wout was (significantly) heavier during winter. I don't know if Mathieu shed some pounds or not.
Mathieu was better at RVV on the short hills, Wout was better at GW on the same climbs. Wout also generally seems to prefer longer steady climbs than short steep ones. On the longer climbs he never seemed inferior in CX. From watching him (Mathieu) mainly in CX, i get the impression that his biggest strength (except for technique and punch) is his ability to recover after efforts. It's also basically what we saw at RVV. The times Wout has been able to beat him in the past, usually occured when Wout didn't give Mathieu the chance to recover. But obviously, that's easier said than done. But for instance, i'm not sure Mathieu would have done a better job at Strade.
Van Aert was a bit disappointing in RVV, i'm wondering if his form is on the decline (which wouldn't surprise me, considering how his season has evolved so far). That said, what Mathieu did in RVV makes you wonder where his limit actually lies and it makes it hard to make a prediction of how he would fare on whatever course. We'll just have to find out. RVV was a hard race of 270km, events didn't favor him, and still he was the only one that might have countered Bettiol. So, who knows what's next.