- Sep 12, 2022
- 9,977
- 11,211
- 17,180
Sure…What?
Pogacar was managing that time to keep Van der Poel with him
Sure…What?
Pogacar was managing that time to keep Van der Poel with him
Sure is to say that he was going to close the gap, just like in the World Championship, in Lombardy, in the European Championship....Sure…
He literally came to around 20-30m... After already chasing for 10-20km's... When he wasn't being motopaced and he was alone. But sure, he wouldn't have closed those last few meters...Sure is to say that he was going to close the gap
Great post. Anyone who followed this race carefully, saw Remco losing time on cobbled bergs quite consistently. In the last Kwaremont, he lost 31" to Pogacar and 25" to MVP. In Koppenberg, another 10-12". And even on Mariaborrestraat, he lost 6 or 7" to Pogacar. I heard about motos but it is quite obvious Remco was on the limit and for that reason he could not close a 2-3" gap, this has nothing to do with motos.I don't know if I'm in the thread Gerrans´ thread or in the thread of a cyclist of Vito Braet's level. Van der Poel, triple winner of Flanders and Roubaix.
I don't remember a single chase where Evenepoel has closed the gap on Pogacar. Only at Amstel Gold Race because Pogacar was coocked; in the other 126748 races, never.
The conviction that Evenepoel will catch him on the flat in a 278 kilometer road race is as much of a myth as a unicorn.
Van der Poel climbed the final pass of the Kwaremont second fastest; Remco was fourteenth, 25 seconds lower than MVDP. That's a huge loss againts Pogacar.
Some even say that Van der Poel should have stopped and waited. That's a stupid idea that would only have resulted in losing more time.
Van der Poel's turns were very lazy. He wasn't putting in any effort, and they were closing the gap behind him when VDP pulled.
Like with Pidcock, there are also tactical gurus who say that Pidcock shouldn't have gone with Pogacar. Pidcock was one sprint away from winning MSR, a very high probability, but it seems that a sprint against 20 fast men like Pedersen, Trentin or Van Aert would have been better.
The only reason he got close was that Tadej was making the others work. He left when they couldn't contribute, didn't he?He almost closed the gap in Flanders, and only reason he didn't was because it was 3 against 1. Pogi/MVDP/Moto's
Evenepoel didn’t close the gap because he wasn’t strong enough or rode the cobbles as well.He almost closed the gap in Flanders, and only reason he didn't was because it was 3 against 1. Pogi/MVDP/Moto's
I called that being a great champion, and having a champion mindset. Opinions.Too arrogant to see there are other ways to win than being the strongest…
![]()
Mathieu van der Poel gaat dieper in op wattagerecord en verandert tactiek niet: "Ik zal koersen op gevoel" | sporza
Wint hij zondag voor het 4e jaar op een rij Parijs-Roubaix? Mathieu van der Poel (31) kan zich bij het clubje recordhouders voegen, maar focust niet op die mijlpaal. "Ik ben realistisch genoeg om te weten dat ik die reeks niet eeuwig in stand kan houden."sporza.be
Not trying to get the best result?I called that being a great champion, and having a champion mindset. Opinions.
To be fair, for Roubaix it‘s the right tactic. Also he should target the Tour if he can do 6w/kg for 90 minutes, especially with all the corners and hill intervals inbetweenToo arrogant to see there are other ways to win than being the strongest…
![]()
Mathieu van der Poel gaat dieper in op wattagerecord en verandert tactiek niet: "Ik zal koersen op gevoel" | sporza
Wint hij zondag voor het 4e jaar op een rij Parijs-Roubaix? Mathieu van der Poel (31) kan zich bij het clubje recordhouders voegen, maar focust niet op die mijlpaal. "Ik ben realistisch genoeg om te weten dat ik die reeks niet eeuwig in stand kan houden."sporza.be
His grandfather always said he could win the TDFTo be fair, for Roubaix it‘s the right tactic. Also he should target the Tour if he can do 6w/kg for 90 minutes, especially with all the corners and hill intervals inbetween
6Wkg at sea level is nothingburgerTo be fair, for Roubaix it‘s the right tactic. Also he should target the Tour if he can do 6w/kg for 90 minutes, especially with all the corners and hill intervals inbetween
At 75 kilos, compared to whom? Maybe not enough for the Tour, but that‘s still more as normalised power, 90 minutes is longer than any climb we have numbers for and so on.6Wkg at sea level is nothingburger
Im sure your boss wouldn't mind if you were as talented as MVDP and brought in as many results as he does!Not trying to get the best result?
I should try that at my work, my boss will *** love me.
Well, he tried to get the best result, and he clearly said not pulling wouldn't change the outcome of the race in his opinion. So not sure how your example applies to this situation.Not trying to get the best result?
I should try that at my work, my boss will *** love me.
"I didn't try to do better because it wouldn't have mattered" is a crap argument.Well, he tried to get the best result, and he clearly said not pulling wouldn't change the outcome of the race in his opinion. So not sure how your example applies to this situation.
Yes, Pogacar drops MvdP more easily if he does 100% of the pulling. Makes perfect sense.There are several tactics:
#1 is bad, obviously. It is not clear what reason one could give to prefer #2 or #3, or some 4th alternative.
- Taking equal pulls with Pogacar. This is what MVDP is being criticized for at RVV, but this is not what happened.
- Doing no pulls. People imagine that somehow the race would have played out exactly the same way until final Kwaremont, but MVDP would have arrived with more energy. A ridiculous assumption. (Pogacar merely would have gone solo far earlier).
- A half measure, where Mathieu pulled about 25-75, and clearly wasn't pulling hard on many of those occasions. This is what we saw.
When you have a lighter rider who can match you watt for watt on the flat, you simply don't hold very good cards.
This is a huge assumption to put in parantheses. I think Van der Poel‘s worst climb in Flanders is clearly the Kwaremont, while people who assume Pogačar would drop him earlier seem to think that 1-2 minute power expert MVDP is bad at the Koppenberg and similar climbs.There are several tactics:
#1 is bad, obviously. It is not clear what reason one could give to prefer #2 or #3, or some 4th alternative.
- Taking equal pulls with Pogacar. This is what MVDP is being criticized for at RVV, but this is not what happened.
- Doing no pulls. People imagine that somehow the race would have played out exactly the same way until final Kwaremont, but MVDP would have arrived with more energy. A ridiculous assumption. (Pogacar merely would have gone solo far earlier).
- A half measure, where Mathieu pulled about 25-75, and clearly wasn't pulling hard on many of those occasions. This is what we saw.
When you have a lighter rider who can match you watt for watt on the flat, you simply don't hold very good cards.
Pogacar didn't attack MVDP a single time until Kwaremont. If van der Poel wheelsucks, Pogacar attacks every single berg. One way or another, MVDP is getting dropped if this happens.Yes, Pogacar drops MvdP more easily if he does 100% of the pulling. Makes perfect sense.
It's not a matter of dropping him on a single climb, it's about attacking MVDP every single climb. He simply can't repeat those efforts as often as Pogacar.This is a huge assumption to put in parantheses. I think Van der Poel‘s worst climb in Flanders is clearly the Kwaremont, while people who assume Pogačar would drop him earlier seem to think that 1-2 minute power expert MVDP is bad at the Koppenberg and similar climbs.
I keep saying this but nobody really does this. And if they think they do they're doing it completely wrong.If you are not a one-hit-wonder, tactics should not be looked at through the lens of just maximizing your chances in a single race. Especially with his weak team and the likelihood of being away with Pogacar again in other important races.
What does your boss say about taking a big risk and potentially losing out on a great return, and instead losing money for the firm? By playing around too much.Not trying to get the best result?
I should try that at my work, my boss will *** love me.
