Does having a relatively bad year in 2005 make it a bad charity?Cimacoppi49 said:http://www.charitywatch.org/articles/cancer.html[/url]
But you're not even bothered about whether its a good or bad charity - you resent the boom for the charity over the last two years due of the comeback world tour.
This is why some of the behaviors are sociopathic. Why can't the charity be good but Armstrong have doped at the tour? It's not mutually exclusive.