Biological Entity said:
This is a confidence game
Yes, that's all it ever was.
The rest I disagree with but we've had 100 pages on it already
JPbianchi said:
I do not know what is all about Schleck first if he still does not know that when you stand up you do not switch the crankset. Well, this is his mistake, i also do not understand this fair-play this is the tour and maybe you are not aware that in the past such as charly gaul lost a Giro because he stopped top take a ****. Actually that was very common to attack when someone had a mechanical problem.
So will see if Andy will be capable of blowing the race tomorrow I would love him to do it, but AC is smarter than him, Also on this thread i even seen Menchov or Sanchez being criticized..
Charly Gaul was the last Luxemburger to win the tour, curiously enough.
Thoughtforfood said:
I think you forget that they are men, and even if my friend were the one that attacked...he!!, ESPECIALLY if it were my "friend," I would think the same thing "sucks for you dude" and probably tell him as I went by that he was buying at the end of the ride.
You forget that this little tactic went on all day yesterday too, with Contador feigning fatigue to bait Schleck into attacking and Schleck knowing all along about it ( he mentioned it in an interview). There's a reason Vino was ready to pounce.
This is a game they are both well trained and versed in; getting caught at your own game is only fair.
Only, in the heat of the moment
- AC thought AS had blown up pure and simple, and/or had only a minor chain embarassment
- AS was persuaded AC attacked after he had dismounted, neither of which actually happened. One got a major problem, the other had gone by already.
I'm sure they are square now after watching replays.