Ninety5rpm said:
Are you trying to imply that he was the only, or one of the few, using such a program?
That fact remains that he was not a flash in the pan. He did not win just once or twice; he won, of course, seven years in a row.
He was not a flash in the pan-he was something much worse-a rider who had no talent at three week stage races who suddenly became a Tour de France juggernaut, one of the most outlandish and unbelievable metamorphoses the sport has ever seen.
As an example-if you followed cycling at all in the 1990's, you would have noticed that Laurant Jalabert and Johan Museeuw began their careers as sprinters, and Abraham Olano was a heavily-muscled track rider.
They all developed different skill sets as pro riders and of course, given the circumstances of the time, doping products played a part.
But not one of these riders made the ridiculous leaps that Armstrong made.
Museeuw became King of the cobbled Classics, but that is not a stretch given that he is Belgian and grew up riding kermesses on the same type of roads he dominated as a pro. He also had the physique for such races.
Jalabert was a great all-around rider who was not a top rated climber or time-trial specialist, but had enough talent in these disciplines to not only excel in short stage and one-day races but to also do well in a few grand tours. Given his talents and the strengths of his teams, his successes were not out of the ordinary.
Olano, true to his track roots, became one of the best time trialists of his generation but never could hold on with the climbers in the high mountains. This was always his Achilles heel and it dogged him throughout his career.
Armstrong, on the other hand, became Pantani in the mountains and Indurain in the time trials while never previously displaying such propensity in either discipline ever in his career previous to his breakout Vuelta performance in 1998.
So when you say THIS about him...
Ninety5rpm said:
There was a lot of opportunity for many people to train and get on the program, year after year, and beat him. They tried, and they couldn't. I would believe that he might have had the best drugs and luck one year, two years, or maybe even three years. But seven years? In a row? And nobody else came up with a better program? That tells me that he had something special that could not be bought. In that sense, I think he was a true champion.
You cannot take it out of context and merely state he had something "special" that made him a true champion. What he had was Dr. Ferarri, working exclusively for him and a few others on his team on a non-compete contract. What made him special isn't anything mythical that his camp would have you believe, all the baloney about him being such a fierce competitor, the only rider who weighs his food and reconnoiters mountain stages in advance. Many riders do the same thing.
The talents he displayed at the Tour during his 7-year run were developed in a chemistry lab. Of this I am convinced. His talents and physique spoke to him being a rider on par with Laurent Jalabert, not what he eventually became. This transformation is unprecedented in the sport of cycling, and can only be accomplished by use of illegal performance enhancers.
If you want to paint him as a unique talent and a true champion, that's on you. Others among us who have seen this improbable metamorphosis happen in front of our very eyes and call bull**** on it.