Carboncrank said:
This place is like that tavern. There's a core group drank the coolaid on the evils of Lance Armstrong long before they found this forum and have found a home here. They continually congratulate themselves on the latest exaggerations, rumors or outright inventions, like extrapolating some big dog tensions at Astana into a plot to perpetrate a sporting fraud, and they use gang tactics to silence or drive away those who don't toe the party line.
You are the most stubborn human being I've read in a while.
First and foremost, how do you expect people to respect your arguments when you come accross saying things that totally contradict what you said in some of the posts? I mean, believe it or not, people read, and read well, even though they may have drunk the coolaid. For starters, you come accross as the voice of common sense, devoid of any fanaticism, willing to help all and one who are being subjected to a verbal
whoopa$$... yet, you just spent the better part of your Saturday and Sunday defending Lance by putting down Alberto Contador, or, at the very least, making him seem like the Spaniard was the one lying (see Contador in 2010).
Secondly you say that we present "exaggerations, rumors or outright inventions", yet everything that was put forth was followed by quotes from either media outlets or cycling world insiders.
Thirdly, you say that we put forth "a plot to perpetrate a sporting fraud" on the part of some Astana, yet all we presented to you is a plan on the part of JB and LA to get out of Astana before the contracts were over, which is not "sporting fraud" per se. We've used various arguments to make it easier for you to understand why we think LA is not the squeaky-clean All-American boy that The Lance Armstrong Show makes him out to be, but rather, an egocentric maniac who has become a character seeking only monetary gain from the sport and does not hesitate to ruin someone's career if they get on the way of his Grand Plan.
Case and point: If Armstrong is indeed such a team player, something he and his bítches stressed over and over during the past TdF, and Alberto is not... Why is Alberto the only leader that stayed with
The Team? And by logical deduction, whose loyalty should be put into question here?
These are the type of simple deductions you are unable, or unwillin, to make that irritate people here. You cannot honestly ask people to take you seriously (which you think is "gang tactics") if you can't get past the initial fanatical BS and then go on to something else... but you insist in drowning the forum with endless posts that refute nothing and worst of all, say very little.
I'm actually know for having pretty good critical thinking skills and a championship level bull$hit detector.
Yes, in the case of Lance you request 16 different quotes from 16 different people, while in the case of Contador a simple "I've read from my cousin's dog's sister's veterinary that..." suffices. Critical thinking at its best.
I don't defend him, he doesn't need my help. I defend against what I see as wrong facts, erroneous opinions, and prejudiced thinking.
But what wrong facts are you talking about? Everything that you posted has been either backed up or explained in detail. That's what I don't get.