theswordsman said:Do you think there's a chance that the OCLAESP would step up on their own to get DNA samples directly from any riders from Astana's 2009 TdF squad who show up for Paris-Nice? I'm anxious to see the RS rider list for the race.
Mellow Velo said:I hadn't really thought about it, in terms of AstanaRS, but now you come to mention it, I'd say that is probably the reason they have specifically asked for these 15 extra tests.
It also sets alarm bells ringing as to why McQuaid is so desperate to keep the French out.
As RR says, it's a criminal investigation, so there is little that Uncle Pat can do, if the authorities chose to act.
I therefore expect RS to send the journeymen to PN and the Astana cream to TA......
......oh wait, that's right, they aren't invited!
theswordsman said:Was the troll reference meant for me, or did it just pop up after my post?
If so, check the history and you'll see I started both Wheel Gate threads (and coined the term spontaneously while typing a title) and pleaded for integrity in cycling journalism this year. I've posted links to articles, live video feeds, and helped steer someone to information about race budgets for a paper they were working on. I got fed up with some things, and the time suck, so I asked to have my account closed, which took a few weeks. If you look through old threads, though, you'll see I weighed in on a variety of topics, and was nice about it most of the time.
If it wasn't meant for me, perhaps you might want to be more specific when you call someone out. I hope you meant the guy on the previous page, but people who don't page back will think you meant me.
theswordsman said:Was the troll reference meant for me, or did it just pop up after my post?
If so, check the history and you'll see I started both Wheel Gate threads (and coined the term spontaneously while typing a title) and pleaded for integrity in cycling journalism this year. I've posted links to articles, live video feeds, and helped steer someone to information about race budgets for a paper they were working on. I got fed up with some things, and the time suck, so I asked to have my account closed, which took a few weeks. If you look through old threads, though, you'll see I weighed in on a variety of topics, and was nice about it most of the time.
If it wasn't meant for me, perhaps you might want to be more specific when you call someone out. I hope you meant the guy on the previous page, but people who don't page back will think you meant me.
Prodigy said:Do you still think the French legal authorities are deliberately delaying the results of their investigation until the end of June?
theswordsman said:Was the troll reference meant for me, or did it just pop up after my post?
ravens said:Deep thoughts by Ravens: "Consider the daffodil. And while you're doing that, I'll be over here, looking through your stuff."
The tdf for Lance may not have been a hoax when he made his deal with Radio Shack, but I think at some point in the last 6 months, it became one.
1st off, I contend that Lance no longer wants anything to do with cycling. But unless he is involved in it, his brand starts to die and its value evaporates quickly. So to extend his brand and increase his value he must stay relevant, he needs to keep one toe in the cycling world. Otherwise he is just a has been who nails starlets and shows up at awards shows and the brand quickly becomes stale. It says 'He's over.' Staying active in cycling gives him a platform to remain relevant via books, appearances, Ride with Lance events, twitt'ing to his sycophants, blah blah blah.
2nd Radio Shack wouldn't have spent large sums of money to sponsor pro-cycling. They spent big money on attaching themselves to the Lance brand. Lance has to make his sponsors happy (or they might want their money back per the terms of their contract.) Will sponsors pay more for a retired athlete or one who is currently intent on winning an 8th tdf? How much more? I think a lot more.
But what happens if he is a shadow of his former self, athletically? What would you do? You're old. You are going to embarrass yourself in a 3 week GT. But you still have some racing appearances lined up that will allow you to put in the pointless attack to keep the sycophants happy. It gets your face out there. The sponsors and believers are still banking on the Big Comeback. So the charade continues. It keeps the cash flowing and sponsors are getting the value for their investment.
I think at some point since July he figured he is done. But that won't stop the charade until the last minute. I haven't seen much lately to make me reassess. I could be totally wrong, God knows I am wrong about most things cycling (but never wrong about politics.)
Alpe d'Huez said:Good Post Mellow (as always). You may indeed be correct.
Not sure what your link was for Carbon - I still stand by what I said that RS will be focused purely on the Tour, and 100% behind Lance. No controversy in that. It's the way LA has prepared and the support he's received since 2000, with exception to last season because of his fitness, and having at least one (if not three) superior riders on the same team.
Carboncrank said:People keep making the claim they are skipping the Giro when they clearly are not. Johann wants to send a team.
Johan Bruyneel said, "We are in talks with the organizers, RCS, but if we participate we will not have riders for the GC. The Tour of California is an important race for us, we'll choose the best formations to achieve the best results."
He has told them who he can send and evidently they aren't good enough.
Publicus said:Just call it a hunch.
Prodigy said:Is the hunch that you might disagree with me? Is that what you meant by troll?
You forgot this line when you were quoting Johan:Carboncrank said:People keep making the claim they are skipping the Giro when they clearly are not. Johann wants to send a team.
Johan Bruyneel said, "We are in talks with the organizers, RCS, but if we participate we will not have riders for the GC. The Tour of California is an important race for us, we'll choose the best formations to achieve the best results."
He has told them who he can send and evidently they aren't good enough.
Oldman said:I agree with most of what you say, particularly about the marketing aspects. Still I think he will make some "herioic" final attempt at something to allow for an exit befitting his image of his legacy. His public life has been orchestrated for awhile now and I think he'll take the gunslinger's ride into the sunset, don't you?
Publicus said:No. I don't have a problem with disagreeing.
Prodigy said:Is the hunch that you might disagree with me? Is that what you meant by troll?
Prodigy said:You've changed your mind then.
+1. More of an inquisitor, than a debater.ravens said:Cards on the table.
Your posts are brief, cryptic at times, sometimes contain innuendo and few facts.
ravens said:Cards on the table.
Your posts are brief, cryptic at times, sometimes contain innuendo and few facts.
There are 10 posts for your user. Another tell.
Your areas of posting are limited to Lance. Another tell.
All I want to know is if demand media is hiring and why the eff won't they respond to my resume submission? I effing need the money and will carry whoever's water needs carrying. If the last 18 months has proven 1 thing, it's that even the proudest men's spirits can be broken.
ravens said:1st off, I contend that Lance no longer wants anything to do with cycling. But unless he is involved in it, his brand starts to die and its value evaporates quickly. So to extend his brand and increase his value he must stay relevant, he needs to keep one toe in the cycling world. Otherwise he is just a has been who nails starlets and shows up at awards shows and the brand quickly becomes stale. It says 'He's over.' Staying active in cycling gives him a platform to remain relevant via books, appearances, Ride with Lance events, twitt'ing to his sycophants, blah blah blah.
Prodigy said:That's okay then. It's just on some forums you get a group of people who call those that dont agree with them "trolls". I'm glad that this doesn't happen here.