ozerulz said:>>This is in reponse to the ToU race. I dont think it should be in that thread, but the anti lance crowd cant help themselves and the mods on this board are, oh I don't know, worthless.<<
Dude whatever. I love this site for 2 reasons. 1)Vino has his own thread where he is rightfully worshipped and 2)People openly bash the great Lance Armstrong here. It's great that there is a place where Saint Armstrong isn't the end all be all of the cycling world. If it offends you so much then leave. Don't read the posts and take your business elsewhere. I'm sure you'll find yourself right at home at http://www.halfanut.com
People should stop for a second and think about why Mr. Armstrong is so disliked. Well, disliked is an understatement, of course, but you know what I mean. The question that is really being asked is whether or not the Lance "bashing" can go too far? I suppose it is a matter of taste, but for me, the answer is a simple NO. There is something very repugnant about Mr. Armstrong that came through loud and clear the year before, when he was "teammates" with Contador. I had respected Mr. Armstrong previously. I didn't understand at first why he was trying a come back, and when I did, I could see it was too late for both me and him. I guess my eyes had been closed and I didn't see. I was blinded by my own illness and thought that, well, here is someone that I could emulate, even at my own stage in life. Gee, how stupid, I loved to ride my bike. I suppose, if I just stopped there, things would have been fine, but no I started to learn about cycling and drugs and things. Not because I wanted to improve my performance much but because I had an appreciation for others that ride well and are serious competitors. But the one thing I could never stand was my own or some one else's cheating. I have to watch myself all the time, and I do, but there were a lot of people that were not watching Mr. Armstrong very well, and he has taken everyone to the cleaners in due course. Personally, I am grateful to the many on this forum that let no holes barred and I could care less if that some of the negative comments about Mr. Armstrong miss the mark. What bothers me the most, as of late, is the the new shtick about "why should we go back in time and spend our money investigating Mr. Armstrong?" Isn't the answer very simple? He is screwing us today, too, with all his generosity by which it seems he benefits the most. I would like to go on about the many ways in which this man epitomizes the frailties of our modern "heroes," but I have to go. What scares me the most, though, is there are so many people who still want to be just like him and defend him to the end. But what I would suggest to these people is that the easiest person to catch in a lie is a chronic liar, and it is only a matter of time before Mr. Armtrong is revealed as such.