For me much of it is in the names he mentions. He talks about female cyclists the way I would talk about basketball players - of whom I know nothing but the biggest names and I hardly ever watch a match. So I doubt he really has some insight in whether a female team is doable for him, he just doesn't care. And in part that's what he says himself, I give him that. But I find it derogatory towards the talent that is there, because he makes it sound like it's just not worth it because the talent isn't there. There are a few very good Belgian riders, Kopecky on top of them, there is some decent talent in youth, but also talent in cx that I think could make the jump. If you can change a male ex-footballer or a rower into a cyclist within a few months, I doubt you wouldn't find the talent on the female side if you looked a bit past van Vleuten.
(Thinking about it though I wonder how much Lotto Soudal/ QS is also in this.)
This is all about that interview you didn't watch and yet insist on interpreting, right?
There's always some craziness on the internet but I'm not sure if I've ever experienced something quite like having to refute someone's very detailed parsing about the tone and subtexts of an interview they didn't watch. There's a Kafkian quality to this.
Lefevere wasn't "talking about female cyclists". He didn't write an essay on the current Belgian women peloton. It was a live interview, he mentioned a few cyclists as a subsidiary element his point. He didn't even had to mention any. It was clear he wasn't being exhaustive - and why should he. This would have been very obvious to you if you had actually, you know, watched the interview.
If you think he was "derogatory" because you don't agree with his statement, fine - go ahead and prove him wrong. Still a bit silly to claim he's "ignorant" or "hates women cycling in general" or whatever.
You still haven't addressed why on earth does your (100% false) claim Lefevere said women cycling "isn't worth it in general" (or come across as saying it, as you say to try to obfuscate you're just making up stuff and lying) squares with the real world fact that Lefevere himself, through his own company, was sponsoring a women pro team just a couple of years ago (and still is on cyclo-cross).
I mean the fact you claim the guy who invested on a team doesn't have insight on the feasibility of a team because you actually know much better is deeply troubling and worrying. About you though, not Lefevere.