Okay, my last reply, then I'll put you on ignore.
- Your tone is totally inappropriate.
- I didn't watch the interview but like I said I read a transcript so I know what he said in full and that's enough for me to feel free to interprete and understand.
- You should look at yourself and what you are writing because you are twisting PL's words the way you want them to be.
He clearly says there is not enough talent, when there are at least 7 or 8 Belgian cyclists, active in WT and youth racing right now, who could very well form a very good core. Enough for a women's team. Some of them are at Lotto, though. He also doesn't mention some female cyclists by the way but suggests there isn't really anyone aside from the ones he mentions, that are good and interesting for him.
Your tone is far more inappropriate than mine: you repeatedly made-up stuff, called names, lied, were uncharitable, etc,.
The problem isn't my tone - in fact, most of the comments on this thread are far more vitriolic than mine and it's not even close; it's that, for once, they were directed at you and called you out, not at Lefevere or someone else other than you.
You can dish but then can't take even a little bit of what you give.
I also suspect you're lying about "reading a transcript" - where was a transcript of the interview even published? Maybe you read CN's piece.
He says there isn't enough talent now.
He mentions the Trofeo Binda and D'Hoore's retirement.
IMO he's right; but, once again, if he's wrong, that's hardly a big deal - people are wrong all the time and that's fine. Except you, of course.
If you were a serious person, you could simply say "I think Lefevere is wrong in how he assesses the current talent level of the Belgian women's peloton".
Instead, you went on rambles about how he's ignorant, how he claimed women's cycling isn't worth it (even though he literally sponsored at eam), and so on.