Krebs cycle said:
The problem is that you keep referring to "anaerobic metabolism" as if it means that this only occurs when there isn't enough oxygen around. Without bothering to go to the literature and read about the mechanisms that underlie the lactate threshold, you decided to make up your own little story about it.
So you invented this little "explanation" about the end capillary pO2 dropping to zero and hence those muscle fibres being perfused by the end capillary start going "anaerobic".
But there is no evidence for this little imaginary story you invented in the scientific literature. It is very easy to disprove though by asking the question "is venous pO2 zero above the lactate threshold?". The answer to that question is a definitive NO. We could also ask is venous HbO2 saturation zero? The answer to that question is also a definitive NO.
The reality is that the term "anaerobic metabolism" does not even refer to a scenario in which the pO2 in the end capillary or the muscle fibre is zero. It does not mean there is NO OXYGEN present. What this term actually means is that oxygen is NOT REQUIRED to produce the ATP. A biochemist would refer to this as "substrate level phosphorylation" whereas they would call aerobic ATP synthesis "oxidative phosphorylation".
The question you are really asking is the following:
What causes the rate of substrate level oxidation to rapidly increase while in the presence of oxygen?
2 events occur here 1) PCr breakdown supplies enough ATP for a few seconds of "anaerobic ATP synthesis" and 2) increased glycolytic flux... which results in elevated lactate production
So the question thus becomes... what increases the glycolytic flux and therefore lactate production?
The answer is NOT a lack of oxygen. The correct answer is increasing sympathetic activation. This is a feedforward mechanism. The conscious effort required to exercise at higher intensity increases sympathetic activation, this in turn increases glycolytic flux and lactate production. If we recruit fast twitch fibres which have very high level of glycolytic enzymes but low mitochondrial density, then there is going to a lot of pyruvate being formed and not enough mitochondria around to oxidise it. This mismatch doesn't occur because oxygen supply to the mitochondria starts to decrease as a result of your fairy world end capillary zero pO2 hypothesis, it occurs because the rate of glycolysis is simply too high and the mitochondrial density is too low.
I have had some time to consider what you have written. Rather than try to get into nitpicking of every point I will try to keep my response more general but to your point.
The first very big defect in the argument seems to be the deliberate denial that anaerobic metabolic pathways for the production of lactate can be active in the presence of any oxygen. Hence your misinterpretation of my contention that anaerobic metabolism occurs as extraction increases and the ability to deliver adequate oxygen to all of the cells decreases due to diffusion limitations. You interpreted that as my saying the end capillary pO2 had to be zero for such a condition to occur.
There is simply zero science to support that view. What is more amazing to me is that other exercise physiologists (such as Dr. Coggan) and physicians are here and not one jump in to correct your mistaken understanding. This misconception must be either very widespread or people just don't like confrontation.
All it takes to activate the anaerobic metabolic pathways in the cell is an oxygen pressure less than is necessary to support the aerobic pathways combined with the cells need for more energy.
Next, you hypothesize that lactate accumulation at VO2max has nothing to do with anaerobic metabolism but rather is a result of glycolysis. I guess one could think that might be possible since a lactate is made during glycolysis but if it were true one should expect blood lactate concentration to follow glycolysis, which generally follows cell work load. That doesn't happen.
Here is a chart detailing typical blood lactate during an incremental exercise test.
This was taken from
this article from the NIH. Lactate levels remain flat despite ever increasing glycolysis demands until they start to rise exponentially. While glycolysis might have a role in explaining some of the background lactate blood levels seen your overall explanation fails right here to explain all that is going on and especially fails to describe the exponential increase in blood lactate seen as one approaches VO2max. Your explanation is not the only one that might explain a background lactate level nor is there much evidence, IMHO, to support it as even having a major role although I will admit, it might.
I think it is clear that the cell tries to maintain a milieu that is conducive to rapid energy demands but also energy efficient. Clearly a ready supply of pyruvate is necessary for this task. The equilibrium that exists between pyruvate and lactate in the cell allows for a rapid replenishment of pyruvate concentrations so oxidative metabolism levels can be high and not restricted by fuel supply, at least in the short term. Glycolysis, being a little slower, simply replenishes both the pyruvate and lactate that are used up immediately. The cell (except for, perhaps, the RBC because it doesn't have any mitochondria) wants to keep all of these molecules for its own use. I guess some might leak out and into the blood, again in equilibrium, but it also might be the case that some
leaks in, as everything is in equilibrium. Only when the equilibrium is upset will molecules "move".
Here is an
anesthesia web site that I think had a pretty good discussion of most of these dynamics (although I think they missed one thing). Enjoy.