Damiano Machiavelli said:Now we are getting somewhere. How real was the start of the product line? The company was not set up by a couple of cycling pals with no money that started small and slowly grew the company into what it is today with the company's image following the products that were sold. It was set up by brand management experts who from the very beginning had a detailed plan to manipulate the public. Starting with a few products made in Britain sounds suspiciously like a plan to buy credibility before offshoring or a way to test the waters and tweak the marketing message.
For sure, a couple of cycling enthusiasts with well developed marketing skills decided to establish a new brand 7 or 8 years ago. Does that make them any less passionate about the sport and their business than a garage start up? Less entitled to success? Not in my eyes.
You appear to object to the iconography that they chose. Really, if you are building a cycling apparel start up, you have to choose from either the modern Euro Racer look or a more understated, 'classic' style. A certain Swiss brand has earned the top spot of the high quality Euro Racer niche and at the time that they started the business, presumably the Rapha guys decided not to compete with the Swiss but to try and create their own place at the top of the high quality 'classic' style. They appear to be enjoying a good degree of success. The quality backs up the branding. (They can keep their city cycling range for fashionistas though)
Brands are built very differently with the technology now available. And even long established (and therefore presumably permitted) 'classic' brands such as the Italian frame builders have offshored their production to maintain or increase their margins. The year of establishment does not determine the accountants search for the bottom line.