I'm aware of that, was just a little dig at the usual suspects that have been pushing that theory with great conviction here forever now.That was always a backwards way of thinking... because the strongest rider on the day is probably the one that drops the other. That is more logical than basing it on that a rider should be capable of it without thinking about how he feels in the moment it actually happens, when you are putting him in that situation. It is not something you can calculate. That he will gain back the time.
Not impossible that someone can get back, of course, but very unlikely when dropped in a hard race.
I'm also aware that of course after a long climb like today not even the most deluded Remco-fans thought he could come back (hm, maybe I'm too optimistic about common sense) but that the theory applies more to flat sections after shorter hills. Pogacar with 10" advantage, Remco gets him back, opposite, Pogacar never sees Remco again. Both scenarios of course can happen, but the opposite too, Pogacar comes back after being dropped, Remco never sees Pogacar again. Most likely always that the dropped guy doesn't come back. Unless it's Einer Rubio or so in front... Today not very indicative for any of that of course, also Pogacar 24 is simply out of this world, but still, after the Colma di Sormano Remco gained a bit back in the downhill, then was destroyed in the flatter part till San Fermo.