I'm going out on a limb and say it's Andy Schleck.Who is abandony? And why are you so bitter?
I'm going out on a limb and say it's Andy Schleck.Who is abandony? And why are you so bitter?
Andy Schleck.Who is abandony? And why are you so bitter?
Him being gone for so long, has basically pushed anticipation over the limit, and that's what happened here. He was flying before his crash, and suddenly his fans have to wait for months and months. When the moment finally arrives, and the first week is going so much better than feared, you start to dream against better judgement. Especially after stage 6, where he was the only one comfortably following Bernal, a fan starts to dream. Had he finished 35th in the ITT, lost 5 minutes in the first 2 uphill finishes, it would have been a different story.When Remco will be his old Remco, he can be competitive also for triumph on Vuelta, of course. When the shape and power is there, he will be great also on steep climbs. But maybe that will just not be this year
Yeah, i'm sure that's how he meant itAbsolutely nothing wrong with calling a rider "Bambi"! Bambi is cute.
lol, you're the only one calling him that. But again, eventually, if needs be by the time he retires, it'll catch on.Sounds like the same kind of whining Abandony fans did when he earned his nickname. And who dared call Armstrong anything other than his name or Big Tex, I mean they ought to show some reverence.
Not measurable, okay, but also not unpredictable.His numbers were indeed good. He was protected at the start. Not like this means anything. Having two protected riders for a team that is not expected to carry the race isn't an issue and they pick the one who fares the best.
That Remco numbers were good is what we saw in the 1st week, problem wasn't his numbers,but keeping them after multiple race days. And like De Cauwer mentions in that article:
Somtimes we pretend/assume we can measure and know everything, but the reaction after a heavy fall and 9 months without races is not something that is measurable.
The fact he made it to top10 now is because he helped and could go in the break. Otherwise he would have lost more than just a minute today. (seeing he wasn't really that good at all today).
You mean Oedipus Tex?Lol. Well there's pharmstrong.
Tbh I think part of considering Evenepoel a favorite was also people not expecting Bernal to show up like this.
Oedipus? Did you mean Sisyphus?
Did you laugh last year when van der Poel finished 10 minutes down to van Aert, in Strade Bianche, a one day race?Simple, remove Bernal from the accounts and this little one continues 26 minutes from the leader.
Sorry, it clearly does.Whatever the end result will be in this giro, it doestn't say anything about his abilty of a GC contender. This giro is used as learning experience and preparation for his first goal of the season : the olympic games.
Are you agreeing and disagreeing with Flurk in the same post?Sorry, it clearly does.
We waited for the evidence - 'what about into the back half of the race, in serious mountains'? That was a question mark on his GC ability, always was.
In fact it's charitable to say that this has not been answered somewhat; to leave it still as an open question.
He can only answer this question with his legs. And we have to leave open the possibility that he may never do so.
It is a bit logically confusing! Apologies.Are you agreeing and disagreeing with Flurk in the same post?
Ah okay. I guess I just interpreted Flurk's post differently.It is a bit logically confusing! Apologies.
I am assuming Flurk is saying: "his ability as a GT rider still remains in tact, despite what happened on stage 16."
And I am saying in response: "his ability as a GT rider was never a given in the first instance, it still remains an open question."
Honestly, i'm not seeing it. I don't buy that he'll win the ITT. It's flat and only 30k, and his form is clearly on the decline. I think the only realistic chance he has at a stagewin is stage 18, if he goes in the break and has just enough left in the tank to finish it on the little climbs.Likely a stage win is what Evenepoel could still go after on this Giro edition. The rest will likely be directed toward gaining experience. And have some fun.
I agree. An ITT is the most honest measure of form there is.Honestly, i'm not seeing it. I don't buy that he'll win the ITT. It's flat and only 30k, and his form is clearly on the decline. I think the only realistic chance he has at a stagewin is stage 18, if he goes in the break and has just enough left in the tank to finish it on the little climbs.
It occurred to me today after reading somewhere after the fact a day or two after the stage, where Almeida lots those minutes early, is that Almeida said he bonked that is forgot to eat early enough. I can't say for certain that is what happened but it is a good explanation for his early time loss on that stage. If that is the case often DS's will make sure to remind young riders, some try to even remind veteran riders, to feed. With the divided attention to both riders it could have been the DS's fault for not telling Almeida to feed. I don't think they would have deliberately done that to put Remco (Bambi somewhat unfair Nickname) as the sole leader but if they didn't do it deliberately (that is if they didn't remind him to feed) then it still was a blunder and unfair to Almeida. If they in their review of the Giro figure out that is what happened then they should apologize to Almeida if only in house.It's different case with those two. At least they didn't have to fight against their own teams.
19 | Remco Evenepoel (Bel) Deceuninck-QuickStep | 0:28:07 |
20 | Louis Vervaeke (Bel) Alpecin-Fenix | 0:36:47 |