Teams & Riders The Remco Evenepoel is the next Eddy Merckx thread

Page 447 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jun 22, 2022
11
19
560
Does someone happen to know how many watts he pushed on yesterday ITT? Maybe he uploaded his strava file with visible power initially, as he does sometimes?
The speed he averaged is out of this world, so I wonder whether it was a tailwind, or he did something like 420 watts.
 
Does someone happen to know how many watts he pushed on yesterday ITT? Maybe he uploaded his strava file with visible power initially, as he does sometimes?
The speed he averaged is out of this world, so I wonder whether it was a tailwind, or he did something like 420 watts.

Haven't seen any, but 420 is to high. Probably somwhere around 400-405W. (probably somewhere around 6.4-6.5W/kg).
Its was a slightly downhill + the necksock & helmet.
 

Bonimenier

BANNED
Apr 1, 2019
4,291
5,930
16,180
Haven't seen any, but 420 is to high. Probably somwhere around 400-405W. (probably somewhere around 6.4-6.5W/kg).
Its was a slightly downhill + the necksock & helmet.
I'm guessing a bit lower. His trainer said he pushed high numbers, but not close to a record since that is impossible in TT position.
 
Dec 2, 2020
2,037
2,936
11,180
Haven't seen any, but 420 is to high. Probably somwhere around 400-405W. (probably somewhere around 6.4-6.5W/kg).
Its was a slightly downhill + the necksock & helmet.
Weren’t they also saying a slight headwind in first half then a crosswind in 2nd half?
 

Bonimenier

BANNED
Apr 1, 2019
4,291
5,930
16,180
Possible

The only real datapoint we have of his power in TT is from Algarve in the beginning of the year, where he beat Kung by almost a minute.

He pushed 392w on average for ~38minutes in that TT.
In that case your estimate might be quite close.
 
Jun 22, 2022
11
19
560
In last year's WC ITT he did something like 383W IIRC, so it's great to see he's still improving.
What's really impressing is that he seems to lose way less power than other guys do in Time Trial position, and this position is among most extreme in World Tour (forehead below buttocks, and extremely acute hip angles).
He really makes me trust that a midget like me can also do good time trials (I'm also 1.71m, lol)
 
In last year's WC ITT he did something like 383W IIRC, so it's great to see he's still improving.
What's really impressing is that he seems to lose way less power than other guys do in Time Trial position, and this position is among most extreme in World Tour (forehead below buttocks, and extremely acute hip angles).
He really makes me trust that a midget like me can also do good time trials (I'm also 1.71m, lol)
This was a talking point back when he was a junior and he even had a more extreme position. The reason is that he is very nimble, which allows him to stay in position while putting out bigger numbers compared to riders who are less nimble, who won't be able to maintain that position all the time and won't be able to output those numbers in said position. This might be one of the advantages of having been a football player until the age of 17.
So in the windtunnel they figured out over the years that his junior TT position, while extreme, was not the most efficient. They have since also put shorter cranks on his TT bike, which allows for a better leg angle. You should read up on that, for me it kind of feels like it would be counterproductive but apparently a shorter crank, while not being able to push the same power on it from a lever-effect point of view, has this off-set by gearing ratio and the speed you gain by taking less time to make one spin since the circle of the spin is smaller due to the shorter cranks.

Junior TT position (look at the aerobar, flat on the handle bar).

https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.gva.be%2FAssets%2FImages_Upload%2F2018%2F10%2F14%2F2d5df3d6-c0cd-11e8-a260-453c537b2211_web_scale_0.0759549_0.0759549__.jpg


Current TT position (see the difference in how high the aerobar is mounted and its angle)

https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.gva.be%2FAssets%2FImages_Upload%2F2022%2F07%2F26%2Fea10ddee-1849-4f56-8880-2855c46b5754.jpg
 
May 3, 2010
4,487
4,563
21,180
After a tremendous first half of the Vuelta he has a firm lead, but there are still three dangers that can keep him from winning it:

*A bad day in the heath on high altitude, especially on the Sierra Nevada.
*Being isolated when Jumbo, Ineos and/or Movistar set up an attack in the third week.
*A positive corona test or other form of bad luck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JosefK and SHAD0W93
After a tremendous first half of the Vuelta he has a firm lead, but there are still three dangers that can keep him from winning it:

*A bad day in the heath on high altitude, especially on the Sierra Nevada.
*Being isolated when Jumbo, Ineos and/or Movistar set up an attack in the third week.
*A positive corona test or other form of bad luck.

first iteration of bad luck just happened. doesn't seem to bad atm, but he seems to look at his wrist/hand a few times.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sandisfan
This was a talking point back when he was a junior and he even had a more extreme position. The reason is that he is very nimble, which allows him to stay in position while putting out bigger numbers compared to riders who are less nimble, who won't be able to maintain that position all the time and won't be able to output those numbers in said position. This might be one of the advantages of having been a football player until the age of 17.
So in the windtunnel they figured out over the years that his junior TT position, while extreme, was not the most efficient. They have since also put shorter cranks on his TT bike, which allows for a better leg angle. You should read up on that, for me it kind of feels like it would be counterproductive but apparently a shorter crank, while not being able to push the same power on it from a lever-effect point of view, has this off-set by gearing ratio and the speed you gain by taking less time to make one spin since the circle of the spin is smaller due to the shorter cranks.

Junior TT position (look at the aerobar, flat on the handle bar).

https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.gva.be%2FAssets%2FImages_Upload%2F2018%2F10%2F14%2F2d5df3d6-c0cd-11e8-a260-453c537b2211_web_scale_0.0759549_0.0759549__.jpg


Current TT position (see the difference in how high the aerobar is mounted and its angle)

https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.gva.be%2FAssets%2FImages_Upload%2F2022%2F07%2F26%2Fea10ddee-1849-4f56-8880-2855c46b5754.jpg
I don’t think shorter cranks are aimed at shorter revolution per pedalstroke, rather increased hip angle. Essentially it allows for a lower upper body without decreasing the hip angle. Hip angle is leading in comfort and power output. Besides, hip impingement (The hip flexor can get inflamed for example) is a real issue for pros. Aru and others suffered from loss of blood flow in that area and were operated on. The bigger the angle the less pressure the soft tissue (no not that soft tissue :)) in the groin area gets.