A lot of harsh, yet interesting comments to the latest CN Remco article about "normally" staying with SQS. The general tenor is that Remco won't be able to beat Jonas or Tadej at the Tour, so why invest in a losing proposition, when you sacrifice the tried and true Belgian-style classics dominance and GT stage success? Thus let him go. Well his performance at this Vuelta could give some indication of his likelyhood (or not) of ever challenging for yellow. However, with that attitude it's better he leave. Soudal must have data that suggests or not if Remco might possibly compete with them. Perhaps Patrick is willfully hedging his bets to fetch the highest buy-out price to sell off a liability he no longer believes in, otherwise he would be offering top salaries to acquiring premium domestiques to support the new objective. Yet thus far an aged Landa is all he has come up with, which frankly seems little convincing. On the other hand, with MVDP, Pogacar, Van Aert on other teams, isn't it a bit late to hope to recover that classics edge? It's like a trap. Either Remco pulls through or you are f-ed.