Despite a professional debut and even a very unusual cycling debut, giving hope for a super champion's career, Remco Evenepoel continues to surprise on each of his outings.
And if it was necessary to throw it in the big bath of the Tour?
To situate the scale of the phenomenon, let us recall the history of the Belgian prodigy.
Remco (born January 25, 2000, aged 19 and a half) whose father Patrick was professional in the 90s, played high-level football since he has several selections in the Belgian national team, under 15 years old then under 16 years old. At just 17, he stopped football and started cycling. With immediately impressive beginnings since his first year of practice he won 7 victories including 2 on international races!
In his second year, he became CLM Belgian Champion (having driven faster than the Espoir winner) and won the Junior Peace Race, one of the references in this age category. At the European Championships, he pocketed the Chrono and then the race online with nothing less than 10 minutes in advance. With these results he aligns himself at the World Championships which he wins both the Time Trial and the race online (despite a fall) on a very mountainous course. A unique double until then in this competition.
Remco Evenepoel is still only 18 when he signs a professional contract at the end of 2018 at Deceuninck - Quick Step. Imagine he's been cycling for a year and a half. Barely believable.
At the start of his first pro season on the Tour of Colombia, he is already in pace at the highest level in the world. Judge instead: 3rd of the Time Trial, 9th overall, craftsman of the victory of Julian Alaphilippe on the 2nd stage. A little later, 4th of the stage queen and general of the Tour of Turkey.
But it is at the Tour of Belgium in early June that he gets his first bouquets: winner of the 2nd stage and the general.
Have we seen such a phenomenon of precocity?
We are forced to return to the cycling archives, talking about the biggest names to try to guess what to expect:
- Gino Bartali, winner of the Giro at 21 years old. Another era, other (lesser) competition.
- Andy Schleck, 2nd Giro a few days before his 22nd birthday.
- Thibaut Pinot, winner of a stage and 10th overall at 22 years old. His manager Marc Madiot did not want to select him because of ... his too young age.
- Eddy Merckx, the greatest cyclist of all time, winner of Milan San Remo (nearly 300 km) at 20, the World Championship at 21, the Tour of Italy near his 23 years.
- Frank Vandenbroucke, winner of a stage of the Tour Méditerranéen at 19 years old.
- Mathieu Van der Poel and Wout Van Aert perform well from their road debut (even if they were already a little older).
- Peter Sagan, winner at 20 years of 2 stages of Paris-Nice by beating on the pedal on difficult arrivals of the runners such as Alejandro Valverde or Joachim Rodriguez.
Of course, with such beginnings, the young prodigy has not ceased to be the subject of the most dithyrambic comments: "extraordinary skills, unheard of" (Philippe Gilbert), "he may become even stronger than me (Eddy Merckx) And the incense nicknames with which it is affuble, often with its defending body, flourish: the little cannibal, the new Merckx ...
So, just over two weeks before the Grand Départ of the Tour de France, for which the teams involved are gradually submitting their selections, a question gets in the debate: Remco Evenepoel must he anticipate the call, and make part of the 8 riders of the "Wolf Pack" which will be on July 6th from Brussels? Should not the Belgian be at the start of the edition that will honor the unequaled career of King Eddy?
On these issues, as often, the arguments and comments are opposed:
No (ie, Remco Evenepoel must stay at home):
To enthusiastic supporters of early participation, or even this year, Remco Evenepoel in the Tour de France or another Grand Tour, it should however remember some fundamental truths of cycling: it is an endurance sport, especially as part of a Grand Tour.
It has always been considered that the pro cyclist must be "fashioned". First the one-day races and stage races of a few days, then the one-week race (Paris-Nice, Tirreno) then high-level mountain races like the Dauphiné, the Basque Country and then the Vuelta (considered less demanding ) and finally the Tour. So debut on a Grand Tour often around 23-24 years (sometimes victory at the 1st participation as Laurent Fignon on the Tour 1983) except some exceptions as the examples above.
The idea is to avoid "cramer" the runner to repaint a term of the jargon cyclist, as if the participation in a Grand Tour in the early years would overshadow a career because the rider could never recover, his whole career , the sum of efforts claimed over 3 weeks. All Sports Directors are therefore afraid to "burn" their nugget. An example is well known with Miguel Indurain to whom José Miguel Echavarri had said before making the Tour: "1st year 1 week, 2nd year 2 weeks then the 3rd year you finish".
Marc Madiot had held this speech to Pinot who had to insist heavily to make the Tour 2012 with the success that we know (stage victory, 10th overall).
And even if there is no need here to carry out extensive analyzes of how endurance skills evolve with age, we take little risk in saying that it is not at 19 that they will be optimal, especially since only the athletic criteria must be superimposed on other factors, particularly the experience that allows to better "manage" the long-term and repeated efforts that are required by these Grand Tours. Moreover, if one refers to examples of very early footballers (Pelé, Kylian M'Bappé), cycling is not football, even for a footballer, and 19 years is not the same age than 20 and even less 21 or 22 years. Finally, it must also be considered that in this period of "specialization" of cycling, Remco may not yet have quite defined the types of races on which it will want to illustrate itself in priority, the range of its abilities leaving him for that the embarrassment of the choice.
Yes (ie, Remco Evenepoel must do the Tour de France):
As early as February, Cyrille Guimard expressed the opinion that "one should not make it wait too long before participating in a Grand Tour". Did he remember the situation of Bernard Hinault, who had refrained from participating in the 1977 Tour, when he was quite ready for that? In football, precisely the sport practiced at a high level in the youth categories by Evenepoel, did not Kylian M'Bappé play his first L1 match at the age of 17? What about Andy Schleck and his 2nd place in the Giro - with his own words, "legs to win" at the age of 21? Especially behind a Danilo Di Luca with a reputation sulfurous and controlled 3 times positive.
Do not we attach too much importance to this "theory of maturity" in a sport deemed conservative, at the risk of wasting time and potential athletes?
The sports results of a subsequent Thibaut Pinot or Andy Schleck were they worse because of participation supposedly too early for a Grand Tour? Certainly not, quite the contrary. The linear progression of these 2 runners indicates that the "cash" taken at an early age thanks to these 3 weeks there, allowed them to cross the steps leading to the top of the pyramid. Some readers will remember Régis Ovion, out-of-class champion and amateur world champion in 1971 at age 22, who was kept waiting for the entire 1972 season before going pro because of Olympic deadline and who has never found the same pedal stroke?
By observing the behavior of Remco Evenepoel in the Tour de Belgique, beating Victor Campenaerts and Tim Wellens, the ambitions of the rider and his management are inevitably mounted a notch. "Tell me who you are fighting and I will tell you which runner you are". And opposite here, we have high-level, seasoned cyclists. What's worse than them on a Grand Tour?
Therefore, on a Tour of Belgium if Evenepoel is able to beat a Tim Wellens in the prime of life, it is because its recovery capabilities are exceptional, in addition to the huge engine capacity - without any thoughts.
From the moment one is faced with a degree of precocity perhaps never reached, why continue to apply rules that are valid for the "normal" professional runner? Indeed, if the young Belgian rider did not have the extraordinary level that is his, it is likely that the accumulation of harassing days on the Tour de France would have gradually plunged into a state of advanced fatigue. But has not he already shown that a Tour of Colombia or Belgium does not break its potential as the days go by? While the Tour is still a level above but nothing would require the rider to complete absolutely the 3 weeks.
However, between the pros and the cons, let's leave the floor to the coach of the Belgian hope that evoked in late 2018, on the edge of his professional career case Evenepoel:
"He must not run for a place but to progress. The 2019 and 2020 figures will not count. With his physical qualities, he can already make top ten on the races of a day or help a leader for a long time on a classic, but it is not the goal. He must not make a Grand Tour before 2021. He must refine his abilities. He must be prepared to become the runner that Belgium expects. During the first two seasons, let him do one-week tours, Paris-Nice, Tirreno-Adriatico, To improve. "
Here is an opinion that had the merit of being clear - but an opinion that is prior to the exploits of the rider on the first part of the season.
To readers, to have theirs ...