At least for the first 10-16 years you have to look in the clinic for that list, another thing that lessens the importance in overall cycling lore. Arguably we have only two recent winners to go on GVA and Carapaz. Great riders but not the type of list we have at the Worlds…
No one is arguing that the Olympics are not important to athletes in general. Which is what you seem to be arguing. It is that it simply does not represent what you think it does in a cyclist’s palmares. It has little history or tradition within the pro sport.
As
@Extinction I think posted, there is no Merckx, no Coppi, no Hinault…no history in the sport.
On top of that, it is a minor event of something that traditionally puts track and field and perhaps swimming at the top of the agenda. A Cycling Worlds is all about cycling and has an amazing list of winners. Kelly rues most of all that he never won and particularly when he got beat in 1989….