That Remco lit the flames of passion was a given, given the title of this thread, but anyone with a head on their shoulders has reserved a critical mind towards him. I don't think the accolades levied upon him denies that. His temperment at times has been called into question, his bike handling as well. The crashes and the way they were managed undoubtedly added to his problems. Yet he came third in his first Tour and you don't do that if you aren't an outstanding climber. Of course, there were two much better, but given Belgium's hopes and an underprepared and underfunded team the outcomes were destined to fall short of the cosmic expectations with the actual level of all involved. Too many ups and downs on a kids shoulders and inevitably something breaks. Something has broken, so now it's time to rehabilitate the person, which may or not involve a new environment. One thing is for sure, he needs to pull the plug, reboot and move forward focussing on a mens sana in corpora sana. Otherwise, he'll never get the best out of himself in the Tour. Surely getting dropped on the first climb of this Tour is not his real level. How this is to be done, I don't know, only that it must be done for him not to become a victim of the expectations placed upon him. It would be a shame for the sport if it sees one of his talent drop into early retirement.