How many GT winners are there that are not great climbers and do you just take that as the reason when they get dropped at over 100 k to go?i already knew what happened: he's not a great climber
How many GT winners are there that are not great climbers and do you just take that as the reason when they get dropped at over 100 k to go?i already knew what happened: he's not a great climber
That he will learn from it? Maybe he implied it"Leaving the Tour was the hardest decision I've made in a long time. But it was the right one. For once, I truly listened to my body. And I hope that moment sends a message, especially to the young riders watching: It's okay to stop. It's okay to feel tired. It's okay to be human. Sometimes stepping back is the strongest thing to do."
What more could he have said?
So there are 2 great climbers in the peloton, then you just "good" climbers?didn't say he was a bad climber. i said he wasn't a great one.
How many GT winners are there that are not great climbers and do you just take that as the reason when they get dropped at over 100 k to go?
So there are 2 great climbers in the peloton, then you just "good" climbers?
Well ok, he could have also beaten those imaginary GC greats that aren‘t domestiques at UAE at the moment but they hardly even exist.last year in the GC he beat: his own domestique, two of Pogacars domestiques and then Carlos Rodriguez and Matteo Jorgenson, who both got big time dropped this year again and again.
Or ... he does everything not to let his team down, wins a stage, helps his sprinter and only quits when the team asks it, not to hurt his later goals. Remco is a 100% team player.
This is the issue with what passes as discussion in this thread. There are several posters who frequent this thread who cannot wait to tell everyone how Remco doesn't have the climbing ability of Pogacar and Vingegaard etc, etc, and not only that, he's just not a very good climber in general. People will counter with his Vuelta win, third in his first TDF but what difference does it make?So there are 2 great climbers in the peloton, then you just "good" climbers?
Jai Hindley is a GT rider.This is the issue with what passes as discussion in this thread. There are several posters who frequent this thread who cannot wait to tell everyone how Remco doesn't have the climbing ability of Pogacar and Vingegaard etc, etc, and not only that, he's just not a very good climber in general. People will counter with his Vuelta win, third in his first TDF but what difference does it make?
He drops super early on a climb in this TDF and those people who love doing him down are the first to jump in here and claim their views have been vindicated, as if dropping before tens of other riders is just Remco's level. If someone points out that this is clearly not his level, well, everyone is just coming up with excuses.
For the record, I doubt many Remco fans feel he can be on a par with Pogacar and Vingegaard; with better preparation maybe he could close the gap somewhat. Probably most feel he needs a change of team. And yes, the inconsistency (for various reasons) is an issue but it's just silly to argue that when at his best he is not one of the best climbers in the world. It's like people saying he's not a GT rider when he's won a bloody GT.
He was helping in front beyond the 5 km mark when Merlier won his first (stage 3), a risk most GC guys don't take (rightfully because Remco crashed in to the usual sprinters crash). He was crucial in catching MVDP when Merlier won his 2nd stage (stage 9).They won 3 more stages. I don't think the team *needed* a semi-fit Remco to have a succesful Tour.
Not that he has to do it, but since you mention it, when did he help Merlier?
He also dropped Onley who might finish on the podium this year. So what's your point?last year in the GC he beat: his own domestique, two of Pogacars domestiques and then Carlos Rodriguez and Matteo Jorgenson, who both got big time dropped this year again and again.
Makes no sense to lie. More than enough riders that have ridden a race with broken bones, also broken ribs.He said he broke a rib before the Tour. There are 2 ways to see it:
- He really is a beast and suffers like no one. A broken rib and he was still strong in the first week. Comparing his performance to Almeida is laughable.
- Or he is lying.
I bet in option number 2. I don't believe Soudal would let him race the Tour and despite his subpar performance, he still rode a good first week (was very hard and intense).
This kid really needs to heal his head, way more than his legs.
So what you are asking for is a CT scan?He said he broke a rib before the Tour. There are 2 ways to see it:
- He really is a beast and suffers like no one. A broken rib and he was still strong in the first week. Comparing his performance to Almeida is laughable.
- Or he is lying.
I bet in option number 2. I don't believe Soudal would let him race the Tour and despite his subpar performance, he still rode a good first week (was very hard and intense).
This kid really needs to heal his head, way more than his legs.
Riding a GT for GC?Makes no sense to lie. More than enough riders that have ridden a race with broken bones, also broken ribs.
Again, another incoherence. "Makes no sense to lie". How many times did he lie this year? Wasn't Remco who said he was racing the Nationals to get that little spark to be at his best in the Tour? Today he is writing a post saying he never felt good this season and was always in a rush.Makes no sense to lie. More than enough riders that have ridden a race with broken bones, also broken ribs.
For the record, I doubt many Remco fans feel he can be on a par with Pogacar and Vingegaard..
Might also just be a small hairline fracture that messed with his training and recovery, because winning an ITT with a broken rib sounds pretty much impossible to me.He said he broke a rib before the Tour. There are 2 ways to see it:
- He really is a beast and suffers like no one. A broken rib and he was still strong in the first week. Comparing his performance to Almeida is laughable.
- Or he is lying.
I bet in option number 2. I don't believe Soudal would let him race the Tour and despite his subpar performance, he still rode a good first week (was very hard and intense).
This kid really needs to heal his head, way more than his legs.
Remco said after Hautacam that he didn't have anything physical. If he's not lying now, he lied then.Again, another incoherence. "Makes no sense to lie". How many times did he lie this year? Wasn't Remco who said he was racing the Nationals to get that little spark to be at his best in the Tour? Today he is writing a post saying he never felt good this season and was always in a rush.
This year, he lied on multiple occasions and he is very incoherent in what he says before a race and after a race.
You can believe in what you want. I just don't buy it specially when facts show he already lied to us (fans).