zlev11
BANNED
Yeah, because Evenepoel being dropped by 80 riders is completely normal and a reason to say last year wasn’t special
like i said earlier, it's happened in 2 of his last 3 grand tours
Yeah, because Evenepoel being dropped by 80 riders is completely normal and a reason to say last year wasn’t special
Source: Cyclingnews Forum. Love it.Wow ... what a great site. Talk about going down the Rabbit Hole.
I asked ChatGPT to give me some peak climbing numbers at the Grand Tours over the recent years. I don't know how accurate it is and I ran out of credits to refine the list. Anyways here is what ChatGPT says FWIW.
![]()
I wouldn’t call him a liar because professional athletes will always chose what to say that fits their interests. But he certainly likes to pick and choose what to say and when/where he says it more than others.Remco said after Hautacam that he didn't have anything physical. If he's not lying now, he lied then.
What surprises me most is that he had a crash on the stage Merlier won and nothing happened. With a broken rib, any accident is a risk and it hurts a lot.
Besides, being able to ride a bike is one thing, but walking is worse, and it didn't seens anything strange.
Holy ***.Source: Cyclingnews Forum. Love it.
Funny *** coming from a Roglic fanboy.like i said earlier, it's happened in 2 of his last 3 grand tours
Nearly as critical as having morons for sports directors and idiots as performance managers.The downside of having a big ego.
Funny *** coming from a Roglic fanboy.
So Remco admits he started the hardest race in the world, at 50% fitness level. Then quits halfway. Nice. His team mates must be incredibly motivated to work for him in the future.
The downside of having a big ego.
That's interesting. I find him candid almost to a fault. For which he gets attacked for answering questions. Kinda can't win.I wouldn’t call him a liar because professional athletes will always chose what to say that fits their interests. But he certainly likes to pick and choose what to say and when/where he says it more than others.
It doesnt make any sense and thats actually a problem. You don’t really know what to believe here.None of this makes any sense. It all looks… amateur. I get that it’s the Tour etc, but why risking your health and the rest of the season by riding with sub-par preparation and a broken rib?…
Finished higher than Remco ever will… 😂 oh wow he finished 2nd instead of 3rd. I’m also sure Evenepoel will finish 2nd at least once.Roglic has won 5 grand tours and has finished higher in the Tour de France than Remco ever will. but sure, bring up something that has nothing to do with the argument because you don't have a valid one.
You should be way more careful when you write these things.Finished higher than Remco ever will… 😂 oh wow he finished 2nd instead of 3rd. I’m also sure Evenepoel will finish 2nd at least once.
Yeah, because it would be so weird for the 3rd best GT rider by far to get 1 position higher if one of the two falls or gets sick. I even think he might win it if lucky.You should be way more careful when you write these things.
Well if Pogacar were to get sick it's probably pandemonium and they'd cancel the race for a cow falling overYeah, because it would be so weird for the 3rd best GT rider by far to get 1 position higher if one of the two falls or gets sick. I even think he might win it if lucky.
They might move it to a more suitable date for himWell if Pogacar were to get sick it's probably pandemonium and they'd cancel the race for a cow falling over
Obsolete data. Last year, he was. Not this year.Yeah, because it would be so weird for the 3rd best GT rider by far to get 1 position higher if one of the two falls or gets sick. I even think he might win it if lucky.
I'm saying based on luck to you because otherwise you keep complaining that I'm a fanboy, and delusional. In my complete honest opinion I think Evenepoel is better than Pogacar but he's just unlucky due to his crashes which stagnated his development. But since no one here thinks crashes have an influence on development that narrative doesn't work.Obsolete data. Last year, he was. Not this year.
You should never make a prediction based on luck (one of Vingegaard or Pogacar to get sick, crash out).
You used to say Remco would win for sure a TdF in his career, now you are already saying he "might win one day". You are already changing your narrative. Let's see if in one or two years, you are not changing your narrative again.
Remco isn't the 3rd best GT rider, do keep up.Yeah, because it would be so weird for the 3rd best GT rider by far to get 1 position higher if one of the two falls or gets sick. I even think he might win it if lucky.
Rogla would have won 5 Tours, 3 Vuelta and 2 Giro, hadn't he crashed a lot.I'm saying based on luck to you because otherwise you keep complaining that I'm a fanboy, and delusional. In my complete honest opinion I think Evenepoel is better than Pogacar but he's just unlucky due to his crashes which stagnated his development. But since no one here thinks crashes have an influence on development that narrative doesn't work.
When we are talking about a specific GT (TdF) and you say "in my complete honest opinion, I think Evenepoel is better than Pogacar... his development", I (in my complete honest opinion and without any intention of taunting or trolling) can't think in an argument other than you really have a delusional and crazy opinion.I'm saying based on luck to you because otherwise you keep complaining that I'm a fanboy, and delusional. In my complete honest opinion I think Evenepoel is better than Pogacar but he's just unlucky due to his crashes which stagnated his development. But since no one here thinks crashes have an influence on development that narrative doesn't work.
Like I said. Apparently people think the crashes Evenepoel has endured have no effect on his development.Where we are talking about a specific GT (TdF) and you say "in my complete honest opinion, I think Evenepoel is better than Pogacar... his development", I can't think in an argument other than you really have a delusional and crazy opinion.