- Aug 18, 2009
- 4,993
- 1
- 0
from "the denis menchov thread" in pro road.
@ TANK91 I'm just talking about their career progression. Menchov has solid dirt on him but his progression was quite orthodox I think. Wiggins is the opposite - he's still being touted as clean, but his development as a rider is extremely hard to swallow. I see Menchov as a compromised professional trying to keep his career going despite being shut out by the establishment, and Wiggins as a not very subtle, ambitious newcomer with a lot of money and the UCI behind him. One got the Tour win, the other didn't. But as I said I don't know Menchov, I'm probablg projecting or something.
The win over the most ostentatiously juiced guy in the peloton was a nice moment for a rider dismissed as boring though.
TANK91 said:Why does it irk when you know he beat a doped up Di Luca, somethings wrong.
taiwan said:Wrong forum. In this forum Di Luca, Menchov and Wiggins are all clean as a whistle
But tbh I don't quite understand your point. It jusr bothers me that Menchov can be chipping away for ten years always just out of range of winning, while e.g. Wiggins can transfer from Wigan to Man U and seemingly take whatever races he wants in a couple of seasons. But I don't know about Menchov's ambitions.
movingtarget said:His fall in the 2009 Giro TT was probably the most exciting thing he ever did as well as crashing uphill in the Tour. Cobbles and water on the road did not help of course but he was a real diesel, similar to Evans. Nothing flashy but always there. As for the other allegations, I will reserve judgement. I think it was time for him to retire.
To continue the discussion in a more appropriate place....melkemugg said:I will not comment on this unless its moved to the clinic
@ TANK91 I'm just talking about their career progression. Menchov has solid dirt on him but his progression was quite orthodox I think. Wiggins is the opposite - he's still being touted as clean, but his development as a rider is extremely hard to swallow. I see Menchov as a compromised professional trying to keep his career going despite being shut out by the establishment, and Wiggins as a not very subtle, ambitious newcomer with a lot of money and the UCI behind him. One got the Tour win, the other didn't. But as I said I don't know Menchov, I'm probablg projecting or something.
The win over the most ostentatiously juiced guy in the peloton was a nice moment for a rider dismissed as boring though.