- Feb 20, 2010
- 33,066
- 15,280
- 28,180
Re: Re:
However, what was Kristin Armstrong doing when Small was racing a full European spring program? Of course she'd be fresher for the US calendar, almost all her racing in 2016 has been in the month of May, while Small has been managing form curves since February. However you could then argue this would mean Armstrong will be fresher in Rio than Small would have been because she's had less miles in the legs this season. This works both ways, you can argue both sides here. Also of course, in many of her races Carmen was domestiquing either for Lotta Lepistö or Ashleigh Moolman-Pasio so direct result H2Hs don't tell the whole story. The London 2012 Olympics are the last time Kristin turned a pedal in anger outside the USA - and apart from Richmond, most of the racing she was doing in the second half of 2015 was not in UCI races, so objectively a lot will come down to how highly you rate the US domestic races like Gila and Redlands against the early season European races.
There is understandably quite a bit of resentment both inside and outside the péloton that when Olympic places are so few in number, riders who have been retired (and in some cases e.g. Brändli for quite a long time, while given her focusing on previous Olympics, Kristin has been in and out of retirement more than Brett Favre by this point) are being taken along in preference to riders whose performances earnt the country its Olympic entries. This isn't restricted to Kristin. Believe me it's hard for me to say this and I really don't want to because she's one of my absolute favourites ever, but objectively, based on 2016 performances alone, it's hard to justify Emma Pooley going to Rio (today she showed the first signs of the old Pooley since her comeback began). At least at 25 Dani King will hopefully have another chance. Carmen Small probably won't, and I think that's also a factor in people's reactions to the decision.
You argued that the strong spring is the case to bring her, but she lost the national TT to... Carmen Small. You introduce the point:jmdirt said:I already posted the evidence (see bold).Zinoviev Letter said:jmdirt said:2012 Olympic Champ
Strong second half of last year
Top USA at 2015 Wolds (a minute + ahead of CS)
Strong this spring especially in TTs.
But what's the evidence that she's capable of podiuming the Olympic TT this year?
I mean that as a serious question, not as a rhetorical one. There's no question about her level some years ago. But you could say that about Jan Ullrich too and Jan is younger than her.
JU has exactly zero results in the last two seasons so you could not make an argument for him.
the two ladies that she is referring to raced in Cali. the week before. What did Small do the week before? Rest, and focus. She can't try to hang them on not being able to recover, when she did not have to do so herself.
However, what was Kristin Armstrong doing when Small was racing a full European spring program? Of course she'd be fresher for the US calendar, almost all her racing in 2016 has been in the month of May, while Small has been managing form curves since February. However you could then argue this would mean Armstrong will be fresher in Rio than Small would have been because she's had less miles in the legs this season. This works both ways, you can argue both sides here. Also of course, in many of her races Carmen was domestiquing either for Lotta Lepistö or Ashleigh Moolman-Pasio so direct result H2Hs don't tell the whole story. The London 2012 Olympics are the last time Kristin turned a pedal in anger outside the USA - and apart from Richmond, most of the racing she was doing in the second half of 2015 was not in UCI races, so objectively a lot will come down to how highly you rate the US domestic races like Gila and Redlands against the early season European races.
There is understandably quite a bit of resentment both inside and outside the péloton that when Olympic places are so few in number, riders who have been retired (and in some cases e.g. Brändli for quite a long time, while given her focusing on previous Olympics, Kristin has been in and out of retirement more than Brett Favre by this point) are being taken along in preference to riders whose performances earnt the country its Olympic entries. This isn't restricted to Kristin. Believe me it's hard for me to say this and I really don't want to because she's one of my absolute favourites ever, but objectively, based on 2016 performances alone, it's hard to justify Emma Pooley going to Rio (today she showed the first signs of the old Pooley since her comeback began). At least at 25 Dani King will hopefully have another chance. Carmen Small probably won't, and I think that's also a factor in people's reactions to the decision.
