- Aug 18, 2010
- 11,435
- 3,594
- 28,180
Re: Re:
What a remarkably complacent sentiment.
Of course, there is more than one factor determining risk. How fast the rider chooses to attempt a descent, certainly, but also the inherent difficulty of the descent. In important races, those who are in contention to win will take risks. It is not desirable to pair that with descents that greatly exacerbate that risk. Because when we are talking about people going down the side of the mountain on a piece of carbon fibre, they are risking not just the outcome of a race but their health.
For exactly the same reason, downhill ITTs are a stupid idea with no place in the sport.
PremierAndrew said:Zinoviev Letter said:Arnout said:Don't understand all the fuss about the descent. Clearly most riders managed not to crash - simple matter of physics.
Both men's and women's races were determined by leaders crashing on the descent. That's not normal and not desirable.
Those leaders risked it, and took one risk too many. That's sport
What a remarkably complacent sentiment.
Of course, there is more than one factor determining risk. How fast the rider chooses to attempt a descent, certainly, but also the inherent difficulty of the descent. In important races, those who are in contention to win will take risks. It is not desirable to pair that with descents that greatly exacerbate that risk. Because when we are talking about people going down the side of the mountain on a piece of carbon fibre, they are risking not just the outcome of a race but their health.
For exactly the same reason, downhill ITTs are a stupid idea with no place in the sport.