Well, I hope would be the last time people said to me... but that in the past was the same... a lot of things in a clean or in a dirty cycling could be the same, exactly, but that is something that doesnt demostrate anything.
That is just: the same that when was dirty.. ok, we could go on like that for ages...what would be the proff it is clean... that the team you dont like doesnt win? Seriously?? a team could win and other not, and the doped were the second.
You are just looking for similitudes with the past, and that make you do not see the clear differences.+
To me, stop saying, that is the same that in the past, becouse I am tired of that, and that it doesnt demostrate nothing.
I dont mind what people said in the past, I wasnt fan of Lance, and I point him as doper, but just when there was an evidence, not before, before you can analyze, point something strange (that is ok if people do with SKY), but no more.
You say then controls fail except for the top ... what do you Know? you take that information where?? In you imagination?? Any proff of that? Contador had his positive, Scarponi his things, Menchov as well, maybe not public, but they have...all of them in good teams and podium in GT...
Controls works... good teams could go to train in altitude when thay want, could even go with his staff.. that is an advantahe, there are more.. but doping? there is no evidence now. there are suspicious teams, yes, but SKY is just suspicious in your minds, US Postal, was clearly suspicious. There are a lot of differences.