- Feb 16, 2010
- 15,460
- 6,204
- 28,180
The crash just makes it more epic when he does win it.I would assume Martin Marcellusi will win today's stage considering the name of the finishing town.
He did crash yesterday, so maybe the win is not as secure as it could have been.
Nope, too many parties interested in winning this in a sprint probablyThis breakaway doesn't have a chance, does it?
Ach, for shoor, we will see.I put the stream on, first thing I hear is Roglic saying "we'll see." As I open this tab to report this, I hear Roglic saying in the background, "we will see."
Is that Jens of the Voigt variant? Commentating for German TV? Does he sound as annoyingly half-intentionally/half-unintentionally comical in German?New season, new wisdom from Jens.
Roglic's interviews show that Roglic=Leonidas.
The interviewers are Xerxes but Roglic won't let them through.
Bonus wisdom: there are white sharks in the Mediterranean.
The last climb is a decent murito. Will anyone have a go? Roglic? Del Toro?
Is that Jens of the Voigt variant? Commentating for German TV? Does he sound as annoyingly half-intentionally/half-unintentionally comical in German?
he indeed is entertaining when they have a real expert at his side and can just tell some anecdotes. Having to analyse the race is unfortunately a bit of a different story. Especially as Bengsch tends to get lost talking about some German-focused nonsense as well.You could say that, but I usually find it pretty entertaining. He always has his idiosyncratic view and he's super enthused for everything and a strategic optimist, meaning he will always ask the quesetion: "how is x a reason for optimism", regardless of what you enter. Also Jens may say outlandish stuff, but he won't believe his outlandish stuff to be the only viable perspective, which would make it annoying indeed.
To be fair I haven't seen too much of Voigt, except when he's been doing the Savoldelli role on the motorbike or the very occasional visit he's had to the commentary booth, but in English he always has his 'funny persona'. Which can be very entertaining, I remember he did a really funny interview in the 2009 TdF explaining how Astana could be beaten. But ideally I want commentators to either be chill or serious sometimes as well.You could say that, but I usually find it pretty entertaining. He always has his idiosyncratic view and he's super enthused for everything and a strategic optimist, meaning he will always ask the quesetion: "how is x a reason for optimism", regardless of what you enter. Also Jens may say outlandish stuff, but he won't believe his outlandish stuff to be the only viable perspective, which would make it annoying indeed.
"We will see".
he indeed is entertaining when they have a real expert at his side and can just tell some anecdotes. Having to analyse the race is unfortunately a bit of a different story. Especially as Bengsch tends to get lost talking about some German-focused nonsense as well.
