• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

TJ Van Garderen's Latest blog, good read

Page 2 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Apr 14, 2010
137
0
0
L'arriviste said:
Just proves he's a kid who doesn't know his cycling history. Like Hushovd. ;)

This is what Abdu does to kids who don't know their cycling history:

mus-abdujaparov.jpg

+1 :D

(never a fan of the tashkent terror, i suddenly feel a warming in the cockles of my heart)
 
Mar 31, 2009
40
0
0
Shane who

Mambo95 said:
if you asked the question 'Who is Shane Warne?'

I'm British and until a few minutes ago I had no idea who Shane Ward was.

Oddly enough I knew of clenbuterol since years as I know a couple of Asthma sufferers.
 
Mar 31, 2009
40
0
0
Arbitrary...

Hitchey said:
Here's an errand thought that's a little off topic but relates to the UCI and their immense experience. Imagine what our bikes or components would look like if the good ole boys who are so wise at the UCI were to get out of the stone ages. The standard bike/frame we might ride everyday might look like the classic Lotus bike rather than a double diamond frame that the regulations stipulate. Bars, wheel design, literally the bicycle as we know it, even down to the commuter you see locked up at the local train station is essentially being held hostage to the current UCI regulations and a frame design that is essentially 100 years old. Hard to imagine that isn't it?

Unless you apply some baseline standards and rules (arbitrary though they may be) you change the nature of an event completely. Imagine kick-assist soccer boots or powered telescopic pole-vault poles? Even if they worked they would not be allowed because it would change everything. If you de-restrict bike design where do you draw the line and how would it effect the racing? I could imagine frequent bike changes from recumbents on descents and TTs to ultralight specials for climbs and all the problems that would cause. Where would that leave amateurs and beginners?

Even in sports that are almost completely technology based like F1 & Motorbiking they often take backwards steps just to try make the competition more interesting (remember ground effect skirts in F1?).

Cycling is about the rider, the most complicated and finely tuned part of any bike-rider combination and whether everyone rides on an "ordinary" (penny-farthing) or a power assisted faired recumbent you have to have some standard definition on what machine everyone must use to try and create "fair and equal racing" based on ability not technology.

The current "standard" for bikes and no radios is as good a baseline as any and it's not as if the records set on the Lotus bike haven't been smashed on todays machines... :rolleyes:

I guarantee you would change your mind about this if it was your job to write and enforce the regulations. It's easy to criticise the UCI for its stance but they do run the sport on behalf of the national federations and (conspiracy theories aside) they are no different to any other world governing body in their rights and obligations.

Do you really know the "big picture" to the same degree as the UCI, is your profession the steering of a whole sport - or are you just buying in to the sexy marketing of the product manufacturers?
 
Feb 14, 2010
2,202
0
0
B_Ugli said:
Yep its a good blog post but if find this comment a bit of a stretch:

The reason this is different isn't because it's a rider who’s won five Grand Tours, it's because 'what the hell is clenbuterol'? I've never heard if it before now, and the tainted meat thing scares me

Now I can understand the tainted meat thing being a worry for Van Garderen but to claim he has never heard of Clenbuterol? Come on now that is simply insulting the intelligence of his blog reading public. I dont know why he is sitting on the fence when all he has to say is "yeah I have heard of it, it goes on, I have no experience of it, etc etc etc".

I'm a lot older than him, and have followed a lot of sports over the years, but if I ever heard the word before last September, I never took notice of it. It's not like he hangs out in The Clinic.
 
Apr 14, 2010
137
0
0
Hitchey said:
It's painful to read how some can berate him for expressing his opinion.
...ah but beration is a fact of life when people express opinions that reveal their lack of admirable qualities (however small they are). Tho hey, I love the fact he’s being open...i wish more of the radio-control freaks would be like that.

Hitchey said:
I'm not sure if your mentioning his comments regarding the lulls in racing and pee breaks as being a *** but how many 35 hour weeks have you put in on a bike, much less at race pace? Now multiply that for 3 weeks in a row. I would assume the statistical probability of that is fairly low- so how would you know how difficult it is what these guys are doing? Not that making the stages shorter or the stage races easier would eradicate doping but it might go a bit towards reducing the problem.
*sigh* it’s not about his whether i’ve done what he’s done, if we were going to adopt that as a requirement for having an opinion then this forum wouldn’t exist.

And I’m sure almost all the riders (even the toughest ones) like it when they get a bit of a breather. But I’ve never seen any of them carrying on about how much they love getting a break, and the fact that TJ does in his blog, really ties in with his pro-radio stance, because without radios teams with sprinters like his will have to do a lot more work. So yes, I think he’s soft compared to a lot of others, and his attitude pretty much matches an attitude common in his age and generation.
Hitchey said:
I also feel that it's exactly this mentality of "get to work and ride and stop whining because we can sit here in our UCI referee car or office and dictate how far and how long you must ride and race to serve the spectacle" that pushes the riders beyond reasonable physical limits- DAY after DAY. Oh.. but wait, you must just suffer because we did it in our day, only twice as far and with glass shards in our shorts. If I had a dollar for every time I've heard an old timer tell me how many hours a day they've spent on a bike with only half a hard baguette to eat all day and a glass of water to drink, I'd be rich.
Like i said, i have no problem in seeing shorter stages if that’s what it takes for TJ & co to be more active in the race. BUT would that just lead to sprinters’ teams having enough energy to shut down every single break? Somehow i think that would be the only outcome. There need to be days for roulers and breakaway specialists to have a crack and a real chance at winning, so it’s not necessarily more mountains we need – rather, it’s less control from dominant teams.
Hitchey said:
Greipel? He is one of the most protected riders in the peloton and saved for the sprints. How many other races can you cite where he has been in a break and worked much less won? Very few if my recollection serves me right. He has not had much luck lately in the last several races winning bunch sprints so perhaps he thought he would try something different. Good on him. But using him, Gilbert, and Cancellera as examples of breakaways is in my opinion, quite the lack of understanding of how those races unfold. Gilbert and Fabian are the type of riders who attack deep into a race and only at points where there has been a lot of attrition and racing in the legs and at key locations such as a small berg late in a race in a classic. Such are points in the race where no matter what a team or other riders do, there's just not enough horsepower left to chase or catch on. That's not a breakaway in my book.
Not sure what planet you were on when you wrote this paragraph...logic101 says the points i made are:
- If Greipel can get in a successful breakaway JUST ONCE (as he did this week) then anyone almost can do it (so TJ is having a whinge)
- Fab and Gilbert watch and attack when they think they’ve got more juice and/or others aren’t watching.....nothing stopping TJ doing the same (tho not for the same target i’d wager)...
- breakaways are part of the sport, have always been and always will be, and TJ wants to complain about this?? Lol. Since you don’t think Canc and Gilbert are breakaway riders (rofl), perhaps I can recommend someone like Sylvain Chavanel to give TJ some lessons. :p
+ yes we know on any given day many small breaks are attempted and will fail until the right combination of riders are found at the right time...so no, it’s not easy. And it’s not meant to be easy, or why would we bother to care? But why is TJ complaining about this anyway? Isn’t he a TTer who can climb....there’s a different path for him than worrying about breakaways....(insert appropriate TJ blog beration here now)

Hitchey said:
I will agree that not having a DS telling a team what to do and exactly how many kph they need to ride per km to catch a break 3 km from the finish does make for more successful breakaways and perhaps more exciting racing. But I also believe that the guys in the races probably have a more experienced perspective and more reasons for than against and that fact alone leads me to believe that the riders are the ones who should decide whether they should have them.

Well, thanks for understanding the point about DS’s turning their riders into robotic chess pieces, that is encouraging. But whilst the riders have experience of riding these races and i don’t, that doesn’t mean i can’t see what’s happening behind the scenes.

Here’s an analogy – you probably haven’t driven a taxi, but you would tell a taxi driver to slow down if he was driving too fast wouldn’t you? Even if you didn’t have a basic motor vehicle license, you’d compare his crazy driving to your dad’s steady driving and tell him you weren’t comfortable, yes? It’s the same thing with the radios...sure one group of people are doing this sport and we’re not (at that level), but that doesn’t mean our opinions are less valid, especially when the riders have other potential biases.
Hitchey said:
Please inform me as to the last race Pat McQuaide participated in with a race radio (as you claim he CAN compare) since the best I can find was that he was a pro for only 2 years and I'm not seeing that race radios were used in racing in 1979 around the time he last competed. While you're at it, please inform me as to the races TJ competed in on the US National team or prior where he did use race radios, since your implication is he "can't" compare.
Last but not least, it’s back to logic101. Pat and the boys have raced back in the days when there were no radios. And they remember for example, roughly what chance a breakaway had of succeeding. They remember this not just from racing btw, but also from watching, as does any cycling fan who’s followed the sport for that long. So they can compare how races turned out then, to how races turn out now. They don’t need to be in the peleton now to do this! Can you imagine if every sporting body adopted a policy like that? “Who are we playing this week? The Oldies? :D
TJ on the other hand, is probably young enough that he hasn’t seen or doesn’t remember watching pro races without radio...and that is why he cannot compare.

And on the flip-side, no i don’t believe the AIGCP should have any decision making power. They have a voice, and that is enough. If they need to strike over something like wages, i say more power to them (and certainly that was necessary in the past when domestiques were getting paid crackers). But they’re now crying out “radios for safety” and yet the riders barely responded to the CPA surveys in 08 and 09 (and the result was 50-50), and they’re not asking for a race neutral safety radio...so read between the lines mate, they have vested interests and are not the people to be making this decision.

If you have any further problems with what i’ve said, please, just go read Michael Barry’s blog pieces on the effect radios have had (http://velonews.competitor.com/2009...hael-barrys-diary-the-peloton-unplugged_98897) (http://velonews.competitor.com/2009/10/rider-diaries/michael-barrys-diary-radio-ga-ga_99071) , or think about the fact that riders like Gilbert are happy to see them go. And Barry btw, is still racing now, but was actually riding for Johan when he started using them to dominate the sport. So if ANYONE can compare....
 
Jul 17, 2009
4,316
2
0
should throw down the extra cash for the organic grass fed beef.

classic love this dude and DZ is ridiculous....

memo to haters. A blog is not journalism....fyi
 
Apr 5, 2010
82
0
0
igamogam said:
Unless you apply some baseline standards and rules (arbitrary though they may be) you change the nature of an event completely.

I certainly agree with you that certain regulations are necessary to prevent a free for all in a sport. Mentioning a powered pole for vaulting is taking your argument a little out there, but I understand your point. After all, a bike is human powered and at the end of the day, that's what matters. Would certain situations favor certain component types or designs, of course, but things would eventually sort themselves out. It's an inevitable course along the path of change.

A case could be made to further your point regarding wildly different bikes at different points in a race and swapping out for different terrain, but tactics and dynamics during a race would sort that out not to mention a simple rule to prevent such bike swapping. We could literally dissect all of the potential drawbacks to de-restricting the rules a bit but no argument can be made with any certainty about what would or could happen until different things are attempted and things are allowed to evolve.
I personally don't envision a tron or mad max scenario with bikes but as I've mentioned, bicycle frame development and general frame/component interface has been at a standstill in relative terms for 40 years-not withstanding the advancement and development of composites and changes in weight/tube shape/strength. One frequent argument is cost and initial costs would be extremely high, but that's just the way it goes in a product production cycle. Plasma tv's used to cost $10,000 and if you didn't want to pay the price at the time or couldn't afford one, then you did without. That would not be an issue at the pro tour level and eventually, the technology would trickle down to what we could easily afford and buy at the bike shop.
 
Apr 5, 2010
82
0
0

As I mentioned, it would be a tough argument to make to say that keeping radios makes for more equally exciting racing as without, but I could skip, from a TV spectator's perspective, 90% of flat stages just to watch the last 6km of a stage and all of the teams fighting for position as they line up their lead outs and the ensuing sprint. In my opinion, that's a lot more exciting than watching a break hover 5-10 min in front for 4 hours wondering if it's going to stay away. People will take different enjoyment out of racing and that's a choice we all have. Riders like Gilbert, who I like, or a Ballan, or Sylvan, or many others who have little chance of winning a sprint against a Haussler or Hushovd or even Cav, will logically favor not having radios. It favors their kind of strengths and I might feel the same in their situation.

One of my points regarding TJ's stating what a relief it can be for the lulls is that he can honestly state that without having to act like some good ole boy tough guy. Exactly the opposite of your opinion of interpreting it as being soft.

Your response that it's not necessary for you to have trained or raced under such conditions in order to have an opinion, in my eyes, renders such opinion less sympathetic to what these guys go through. I am personally glad that you and I can voice our opinions as such, but to sit back and imply that he's complaining, which is not the same as voicing relief from having to drive a pack on the front at 350 watts for 5 hours, only furthers what I feel to be a problem with sport. Sure, you can sit back and form a arm chair opinion and feel strongly about it, but unless you've got some perspective or experience with it, it's just not as informed as someone who has been there or experienced something like it.
It's like the national football league. It's easy to tell the guys to play harder and hit harder when it's not your head ramming into someone else day after day.
It's a simple point regarding McQuaide. He has not to the best of my knowledge, raced with radios whereas TJ has. It's pointless to ask whether TJ has watched pro races without radios since he has raced without them.
Next time I ride with him, I'll ask him if he had radios in all the races in the days when he was with Rabobank's continental team. I would guess not all the time if at all.
 
Oct 11, 2010
777
0
0
That blog sucked. Sounds like he's saying exactly what the DS's/other riders would want him to say but attempting to do it in a way that also appeases the fans. Pompous ***.
 

TRENDING THREADS