- Aug 6, 2015
- 4,139
- 2
- 0
Red Rick said:I would do the reverse with Kelderman and Oomen. Kelderman has proven he's good enough for a Tour GC, and they don't really need to fight for the win. Sam Oomen is a good prospect, but he has not finished a GT yet, so I wouldn't send him to ride the Tour for GC. If he improves he could be a great dom for Dumoulin.yaco said:Doubt Kelderman will ride the TDF - Expect Oomen could go for a soft GC, while most pressure will be on Matthews in a route that suits his characteristics.
I love me some Kelderman bashing but he definitely deserves to be ahead of Oomen in the pecking order as of 2017
Contador stopped being a threat at the Tour a long time before his retirement.HelloDolly said:Shame Dumoulin is losing out on a big chance to win the Tour ..I dont understand ....must have gotten a big payout from RSC
He has a Giro already ....go to the Tour ...without Froome & Contador ...the Tour is for the taking Tom
jflemaire said:Contador stopped being a threat at the Tour a long time before his retirement.HelloDolly said:Shame Dumoulin is losing out on a big chance to win the Tour ..I dont understand ....must have gotten a big payout from RSC
He has a Giro already ....go to the Tour ...without Froome & Contador ...the Tour is for the taking Tom
portugal11 said:Noooooo. why tom? now quintana and nibali have a fairly chance of winning the tour
Kwibus said:portugal11 said:Noooooo. why tom? now quintana and nibali have a fairly chance of winning the tour
Whatever, this tdf course is anti dumoulin. He made the right choice.
Dumoulin has to take time in the first tdf week which is not garanteed, its likely, but also a big unknown.
Besides that he only has a tt that suits climbers most, he will take time there, but enough to overcome the losses in the mountains?
Giro he has a bigger chance of winning and he allready said before he'd rather win the giro than finish 3rd in the tdf.
he has the TTT and the ITT to gain a 1.30 minutesKwibus said:portugal11 said:Noooooo. why tom? now quintana and nibali have a fairly chance of winning the tour
Whatever, this tdf course is anti dumoulin. He made the right choice.
Dumoulin has to take time in the first tdf week which is not garanteed, its likely, but also a big unknown.
Besides that he only has a tt that suits climbers most, he will take time there, but enough to overcome the losses in the mountains?
Giro he has a bigger chance of winning and he allready said before he'd rather win the giro than finish 3rd in the tdf.
Kwibus said:portugal11 said:Noooooo. why tom? now quintana and nibali have a fairly chance of winning the tour
Whatever, this tdf course is anti dumoulin. He made the right choice.
Dumoulin has to take time in the first tdf week which is not garanteed, its likely, but also a big unknown.
Besides that he only has a tt that suits climbers most, he will take time there, but enough to overcome the losses in the mountains?
Giro he has a bigger chance of winning and he allready said before he'd rather win the giro than finish 3rd in the tdf.
Yeah fans are taking Dumoulin for granted as a GC rider. He has 2 GT top 10s, one win, and he's not that much of a factor in the other mountainious stage races, so it's not like we have a big indication of how consistent he is across GCs.Escarabajo said:Ok. Dumoulin won the Giro last year. But for Froome not going to the Tour was a given that Dumoulin had a walk in the park to win the Tour?
I don't think so. Am I missing something or fans are giving him too much credit at this time?
Yeah they are. It's just natural though. People want someone to challenge Froome. The climbers ala Quintana and Bardet and Aru can challenge him uphill but are slaughtered in a time trial. So they see Dumoulin win the Giro (a TT heavy Giro) and thus he should challenge Froome.Escarabajo said:Ok. Dumoulin won the Giro last year. But for Froome not going to the Tour was a given that Dumoulin had a walk in the park to win the Tour?
I don't think so. Am I missing something or fans are giving him too much credit at this time?
I wouldn't call the way Froome won relative ease. He had all the team in the world and couldn't drop Bardet or Uran if his life depended on it and he was inconsistent in the big mountains of the Vuelta as well.Dekker_Tifosi said:Yeah they are. It's just natural though. People want someone to challenge Froome. The climbers ala Quintana and Bardet and Aru can challenge him uphill but are slaughtered in a time trial. So they see Dumoulin win the Giro (a TT heavy Giro) and thus he should challenge Froome.Escarabajo said:Ok. Dumoulin won the Giro last year. But for Froome not going to the Tour was a given that Dumoulin had a walk in the park to win the Tour?
I don't think so. Am I missing something or fans are giving him too much credit at this time?
But the relative 'ease' where Froome beated the same competitors in tour/vuelta last year makes it clear. Dumoulin vs others would be really really close and I'm not even remotely sure who the best would be on a course with only 1 ITT (and a TTT) without Froome and with Nibali, Quintana, Bardet in top form against Dum. I think it's more probably he'd lose..
It's interesting what the Giro will bring. Dumoulin vs a good Aru and a good Chaves on, what seems, a balanced course, but what is still a climbers course for me (40tt km is too little to call it really balanced). If Froome can participate it makes it even more interesting![]()
Dekker_Tifosi said:Dude, Froome doesn't need to drop others. He stayed with thim or led relatively little damage. And then blast them away, even if it's only 30km TT in total.
Dumoulin cannot stay that close over multiple mountain stages as Froome does.
dumoulin can climb as good as 2017 froome, he was super tired in the final of the giro because he didn't have any teammates to help him in the last 10 kmDekker_Tifosi said:Dude, Froome doesn't need to drop others. He stayed with thim or led relatively little damage. And then blast them away, even if it's only 30km TT in total.
Dumoulin cannot stay that close over multiple mountain stages as Froome does.
Red Rick said:Bardet and Uran are hardly the likes of Quintana. He tried to get rid of them repeatedly, and couldn't. That's not quite the dude who put the field at about 1 minute + on a uniclimb stage a few years ago.
I fail to see how it was more impressive than controlling Quintana and Nibali on your own for 50km + on a big mountain stage.
Red Rick said:I would do the reverse with Kelderman and Oomen. Kelderman has proven he's good enough for a Tour GC, and they don't really need to fight for the win. Sam Oomen is a good prospect, but he has not finished a GT yet, so I wouldn't send him to ride the Tour for GC. If he improves he could be a great dom for Dumoulin.yaco said:Doubt Kelderman will ride the TDF - Expect Oomen could go for a soft GC, while most pressure will be on Matthews in a route that suits his characteristics.
I love me some Kelderman bashing but he definitely deserves to be ahead of Oomen in the pecking order as of 2017
Possibly. Having said that, if it wasn't for poopgate, his Giro win would have been much more impressive, larger time gaps on two big champions like Quintana and particularly Nibali.Escarabajo said:Ok. Dumoulin won the Giro last year. But for Froome not going to the Tour was a given that Dumoulin had a walk in the park to win the Tour?
I don't think so. Am I missing something or fans are giving him too much credit at this time?
Red Rick said:According to recent interviews Dumoulin was super overwhelmed by all the attention he got after winning the Giro. Doesn't really seem to be into all the attention, and he may want to avoid the biggest circus for now.
Tom D threadportugal11 said:froome would have lost a minute on peyragudes if it wasn't sky the super killer machine who controls everybody
Red Rick said:According to recent interviews Dumoulin was super overwhelmed by all the attention he got after winning the Giro. Doesn't really seem to be into all the attention, and he may want to avoid the biggest circus for now.