- Apr 13, 2021
- 8,469
- 21,614
- 18,180
Does anyone want to teach me some stuff about gene doping. Even with a top programme I don't understand how a 19yo does this?
In the fastest edition ever (almost 10% faster than the 2nd fastest edition). So it is not that they could relax until blasting the climbs. The others look like amateurs in comparison.13 seconds faster on the redoute for both of the aliens today. Seems legit
he had a bad preparation for avenir last year , and steadily improved throughout the seasonLast year Widar was competition for him. Now it's a different level.
Admittedly, I'm just mostly happy I don't need to look at Pogacar riding away the last 40kms by himself. Two mutants is better than one. (None would be ideal). So pragmatism makes me happy he is here.
Rumour has it that he did two things. First, he secretly slipped a couple thousand euros to the mythical Sola and finally got training right. (The prescription was long intervals that everyone from lowly amateurs up does anyway). Second, he started to mainline porridge. And presto, here we are.Does anyone want to teach me some stuff about gene doping. Even with a top programme I don't understand how a 19yo does this?
It doesn't look good when you say it's CRISPR without any further explanation or theory to why or how that might be.CRISPR. Told you years ago. Its no science fiction, it's being used.
Why? He just wants to let us know he thinks it's gene doping.It doesn't look good when you say it's CRISPR without any further explanation or theory to why or how that might be.
Don't mind me, I'm just tidying up the forum.Breschel after talking with Baudin (good friend of Seixas) said Seixas was improving 20 watts each month during winter.
Pogacar was the best rider in the world before 2024. He was very dominant until his crash in LBL.He was a rider on the level of Scaroni or Jay Vine in October. He was expected to improve a lot absolutely, the next Tour winner in a few years time perhaps. As we said at the time he had been doing everything correctly and diligently for years. A few months later he is churning out some of the best climbing performances of all time.
As always, with now and with 2024, you look at the rate of change, it is a total fantasy for the body to make such training adaptations naturally in such a short period of time for an already supreme athlete. I'm extremely curious as to the method, it's not like they can just mainline EPO like they did in the mid 90s, not with the restrictions in place.
Someone finally makes a considered and articulate post in the clinic and within 5 minutes the discussion gets reduced to 'by contrast my favourite rider is totally cleanz'
Is this really the new debate: is Seixas more doped than Pogacar?Pogacar was the best rider in the world before 2024. He was very dominant until his crash in LBL.
Seixas finished 9' behind Pogacar in Rwanda, was beaten by Widar in mountain stages and was fighting with Scaronni in GdL. The leap Seixas took was way bigger than any jump in performance Pogacar made in his career.
Yeah sure, though in his defence Seixas is a lot younger so you would expect at a greater room for growth, but not in a few months. I could've also said Froome post-Tour of Poland, Nicholas Prodhomme 2025 or Padun as examples. The point is that he's taken a quantifiable leap in such a short period of time that is difficult to explain away, gains in power that you would expect an 18 month old toddler to make when he starts walking.I thought about it for a moment, and going from Seixas level at the end of last year to nearly Pogacar level might actually be a bigger jump than the one Pogi made in 2024. Not withstanding that "but rider x is more cleanz" is usually annoying.
I don't even really disagree with canina's point. Maybe I overreacted a little bit, but sometimes on the clinic it's like there is only one doper, and it is he who is the most over the top at any given moment. Discussions get framed that sexass is now the villain, that pocagar is suddenly fine in comparison. It annoys me a little bit.I thought about it for a moment, and going from Seixas level at the end of last year to nearly Pogacar level might actually be a bigger jump than the one Pogi made in 2024. Not withstanding that "but rider x is more cleanz" is usually annoying.
It is certainly the most insane transformation yet and the most interesting to speculate aboutYeah sure, though in his defence Seixas is a lot younger so you would expect at a greater room for growth, but not in a few months. I could've also said Froome post-Tour of Poland, Nicholas Prodhomme 2025 or Padun as examples. The point is that he's taken a quantifiable leap in such a short period of time that is difficult to explain away, gains in power that you would expect an 18 month old toddler to make when he starts walking.
A couple of things were interesting, I've looked around but some on here might have better answers.
He spent 2 months at altitude before the season started, rather than the 3-4 week protocol of other teams, what is the purpose of this? This is where the leap occurred. As far as I'm aware any effect after a month is minimal and is often offset by a lack of sleep quality. Pogacar and Vingegaard for example usually do 2 camps of 3-4 weeks a season, with the second one having a greater effect. I've seen no explanation for the change, other than 'he lives like a monk!'.
Why is he not getting any worse? Adaptions do not last a long time, which is why people usually go back after the Dauphine and stay as close to the race as possible. He did roughly the same w/kg for over a minute longer on La Redoute than he had done a few days prior in a much easier race, there is no discernible dip that you would usually see over a span of 2.5 months, especially from a 19 year old, no periodization. You would expected someone so young to be battered by these races, but if anything he looks fresher now than he did in Algarve.
It's like everything you learn about sports science as a fan and amateur athlete stops applying to these guys.
A lifetime of selfiesNo wonder why nobody applied for the UCI presidency. Who would want such a job?
With all (t)his mess to clean up, Lappartient will end up being a lifetime president.
Poggie took the first massive leap already in 18/19 after starting to work with Gianett&UAE, at the same age as Seixas is now. You need to start building the narrative early, so you make the "generational" talent thing beliavable. Pauls leap is as outrageous as has poggies been, but at least he was considered a big talent before this season too. Not like the reasonably talented stage racer, who does it all with ease and record breaking power these days.Pogacar was the best rider in the world before 2024. He was very dominant until his crash in LBL.
Seixas finished 9' behind Pogacar in Rwanda, was beaten by Widar in mountain stages and was fighting with Scaronni in GdL. The leap Seixas took was way bigger than any jump in performance Pogacar made in his career.
If you take your point of view one, two, three ...steps further.. The person wanting an absolutely @@@@@@@@ job, what kind of person is running the organization? What part of any Western economy offers a job and nobody takes it? What is the effect on races , riders, sponsors, governments from having sub standard management at the UCI?No wonder why nobody applied for the UCI presidency. Who would want such a job?
With all (t)his mess to clean up, Lappartient will end up being a lifetime president.
I hadn't really thought of this yet, but yeah, that's probably it. It's exactly what happened in the 90s with EPO, and how the Omerta started. Because it wasn't all a big planned conspiracy, it just kind of organically grew in exactly the way you described.Anyway, Pogacar has opened a big door for other riders. If they don’t catch them, they won’t catch us either, so let's go.
Yeah, in my experience there's two kinds: people who are fan of cycling, and people who are fan of cyclists.Brings back memories of being accused of being a Vingegard fanboy for posting in povagar's clinic thread.
