Well he's out of LBL, and now has a week to recover for the first round of the Swiss MTB Cup at Leukerbad.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
You clearly still don't understand. If you known so much better, why not contact the UCI, Jempi Jooren, the head UCI-commissionar in the Amstel and Renee Gielen, the photo-finish operator. They all stated that the result was correct. But I suppose you will be appointed as photo-finish operator or UCI-commissionar soon....So it can be demonstrated (scientifically) that, despite all appearances, van Aert's airborne wheel was actually several centimeters ahead of Pidcock's at the time the latter's front tire traversed the black line? Proove it.
The discussion, still ongoing despite your peremptory declarations of closure, also involves the grotesque reality of the real black finish line being merely illusory, given that an invisible one set by the photo finish camera's position slightly before it now becomes the unseen adjudicator of the race. But this is merely a hideous deformity of the event, as these circumstances demonstrate.
Let's put it this way, I accept van Aert won, but not that he reached the black line first (the illusory finish line). I understand perfectly, it is you who don't get it.s
You clearly still don't understand. If you known so much better, why not contact the UCI, Jempi Jooren, the head UCI-commissionar in the Amstel and Renee Gielen, the photo-finish operator. They all stated that the result was correct. But I suppose you will be appointed as photo-finish operator or UCI-commissionar soon....
Normally he will do the Vuelta this year. (Obviously) there will be some other serious GC-contenders on his team. I think both Bernal and A. Yates are riding the Vuelta as well.Does anyone know if Pidcock is doing a GT this year?
Personally I see him as a potential GT winner, and probably the biggest threat to the expected Pogacar/Evenepoel GT dominance in years to come.
Why don't you think so? He's got the watts and the weight to perform well on climbs. He destroyed the baby Giro last year. He became junior world TT champion so he's got that as well. And he's in a team that knows how to form GC-riders.Let the words fall back down on me... but I think there's a lot of hype around Pidcock and I don't think it's well-grounded when it comes to GTs.
Why don't you think so? He's got the watts and the weight to perform well on climbs. He destroyed the baby Giro last year. He became junior world TT champion so he's got that as well. And he's in a team that knows how to form GC-riders.
BTW, his weight has always been the same, right? He's never randomly gained or lost weight...
(And of course, randomly gaining or losing weight is significantly easier than gaining or losing height.)
Why don't you think so? He's got the watts and the weight to perform well on climbs. He destroyed the baby Giro last year. He became junior world TT champion so he's got that as well. And he's in a team that knows how to form GC-riders.
I think he was lighter when he was born.
He has practically never ridden against pro riders in stage races, How could he beat them?Well, that is true, I guess if Ineos want to make him a GT winner, they will...
But so far he hasn't shown more than "promise" in stage races. He hasn't beaten any of the best there, but other very talented youngsters. The best of his age have already beaten much bigger names on climbs. Of course, he isn't a full road racer, yet, unlike others, so there is much room to improve once he does - but as much as this could play out it could be it doesn't. He destroyed the Baby Giro against Vandenabeele - nothing against him, that guy is awfully talented. But I think he's not a good indicator, yet.
He has practically never ridden against pro riders in stage races, How could he beat them?
He's arguably the best british GT prospect ever coming out of the u23 ranks.
Cavendish? Tom Simpson? Even Ian Stannard?+ isn't he the British rider with the all time best results in one day races already?
There even is a current British rider in his own team who still has better results in one day races.+ isn't he the British rider with the all time best results in one day races already?
Let the words fall back down on me... but I think there's a lot of hype around Pidcock and I don't think it's well-grounded when it comes to GTs.
He won the babygiro with 2m25s ahead of... Henri Vandenabeele. Now, Vandenabeele has some potential, and he'll be a great pro in a few years, but from his own country, of only his own birthyear, he was only 4th in line. On top of that, he's a year younger than Pidcock as well. Let's just agree the field was "not what it could have been".Well, he is 21 years of age, 170 cm, 58 kg, and won the baby giro last year incl. winning 2 mountain finishes, so there is that.
Not saying he is winning a GT this year - but most definitely see him as a main contender for the future.
The big question for me is his TT, which we are yet to see.
He won the babygiro with 2m25s ahead of... Henri Vandenabeele. Now, Vandenabeele has some potential, and he'll be a great pro in a few years, but from his own country, of only his own birthyear, he was only 4th in line. On top of that, he's a year younger than Pidcock as well. Let's just agree the field was "not what it could have been".
I know it's a "big win" but it needs to be put in perspective. He climbs well, but compared to top tier climbers? We don't know. I actually have less questions about is ITT, since we already know that will not be a weakness, even more of a strength, compared to other climbers. Junior worldchampion ITT, and 4th in last years Euro championship U23, behind Leknessund, Bissegger and Van Wilder.
I'm sorry, i thought we were trying to look for markers that could indicate whether he could become a good GC/GT rider. Because in that case, it would matter quite a lot what the competition was.Well, you can only beat those that enter the race.
The margin is irrelevant to me, as that will always be dependent on how the race unfolds - nobody is killing themselves to win by a larger margin, if it is not needed.
As the race results read:
Stage 1: Break takes it by 15 seconds
Stage 2: Bunch sprint
Stage 3: 2nd in a group of 5
Stage 4: Win
Stage 5: Bunch sprint
Stage 6: Bunch sprint
Stage 7: Win
Stage 8: Win
I'm sorry, i thought we were trying to look for markers that could indicate whether he could become a good GC/GT rider. Because in that case, it would matter quite a lot what the competition was.
No, i'm suggesting we compare him to riders he HAS actually competed against. And not assume anything.Do you want me to compare him to riders he hasn't competed against?
No, i'm suggesting we compare him to riders he HAS actually competed against. And not assume anything.
Where did i say he wouldn't be a future GT contender? I'm saying we can't say he will be based on his win in the Baby Giro. Saying we can't be sure, is not the same as saying he won't be, i thought that'd be obvious.So what is your argument again, for him not being a future GT contender - except for who DIDN'T race the baby Giro last year?