Then please do...I cannot help but notice the obvious irony of your exchange.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Then please do...I cannot help but notice the obvious irony of your exchange.
Your lack of knowledge of photo-finish technology, linked to your stubbornness, seams to lead to stupidity.
Being led by blind faith in such technology, as well as those interpreting it, shuts the eyes to reason and leads to foolishness.Your lack of knowledge of photo-finish technology, linked to your stubbornness, seams to lead to stupidity.
He's ranked 28th in the XCO rankings at the moment. I believe that means he gets a spot in the XCC. Even if he doesn't finish in the top sixteen, which is probably unlikely as we've seen that this is suited to someone with a CX base like VDP, he would still start 28th for this round. That wouldn't be too bad considering it is only the third row and the opening half of the start lap is quite open or has a lot of double track. However, if they race it as hard as last time in Albstadt, then it could be quite a challenge. That first climb is a real power climb so the gaps will be big if attacked.Thing is, before the XCC (short track) the riders with only few points would start from far back. I'd take them a lot of time/laps and effort to make it to the front (usually). Even when not beating Nino, MVDP was always really close and looked like the only one who can compete with him since the almost the beginning of his XCO WC racing campaign.
Then go and join (or replace) the time-and photo-finish-specialists and the UCI-commisars. We all look forwards to Extinction's technical reforms next year when designated by the UCI as an expert in the field.Being led by blind faith in such technology, as well as those interpreting it, shuts the eyes to reason and leads to foolishness.
It's clearly not up to me or you for that matter, but that is no excuse not to be critical. You are lazily comparing apples to oranges.Then go and join (or replace) the time-and photo-finish-specialists and the UCI-commisars. We all look forwards to Extinction's technical reforms next year when designated by the UCI as an expert in the field.
Best to ignore. A calibrated piece of equipment and simple math shows van Aert still in the lead 1.5m after crossing the line. At this stage it's like convincing people the earth isn't flat.It has nothing to do with being critical. You just play the "I know better than the experts on the field, no need to try and convince me otherwise" card. We've seen enough of that during Covid-19.
Or get a room.FFS, you lot need to meet up in a field somewhere with your handbags and have it out to the death! Well, not death but until the handbag straps break.
You have "some" compitency of analyze photo images. Jezus ! Photo-finish technology has nothing to do with classic photo's. Again, contact the experts, and the UCI and make your complaints about it, and immediately apply for the post of photo-finish expert.I'm game. This is indeed the stupidest argument I've come across, but only because the Belgians take this too damn seriously. Expertise isn't required to analyze photo images (of which I actually have some compitency), nor are experts infallible (otherwise the would be gods) and it's got nothing to do with Covid and the conspiracy mongers. Apples to oranges along with a fair bit of condescending arrogance.
Post Scriptum: I do have a Belgian colleague, however, who thinks Pidcock won!
Simple math applies to the bike and rider as a whole, not to the front wheel.Best to ignore. A calibrated piece of equipment and simple math shows van Aert still in the lead 1.5m after crossing the line. At this stage it's like convincing people the earth isn't flat.It would mean Pidcock would have been going more than 10% faster than van Aert, in order to make up 2.5cm (his deficit at the point the finish camera was placed) in 25cm (the distance to where the black line was). You don't even have to measure anything to see that Pidcock is not going that much faster, if at all.
PfffYou have "some" compitency of analyze photo images. Jezus ! Photo-finish technology has nothing to do with classic photo's. Again, contact the experts, and the UCI and make your complaints about it, and immediately apply for the post of photo-finish expert.
It's possible one is better today on a certain course, and another is better tomorrow on a different course. We don't have to rank them, there are no absolutes.Why is this happening right now though? All these super-allrounders.
But mighty impressive from Pidcock. MvdP is already said to be the better WvA, although road racing made clear that they have a rathter different skill set and now Pidcock is beating MvdP in MTB CX at his young age and fighting it with WvA on the road already. Like I said, impressive.