- Jul 14, 2009
- 2,498
- 0
- 0
xnobrakesx said:You live in absolutes. My point is just that we should be careful with every positive test. My statement did not say he was innocent, nor guilty. I just don't understand why it is so easy to dismiss an accidental usage of a banned substance as simply an accident. This doesn't mean he is not at fault for what substances he puts in his body, but DHEA is in a lot of over the counter items and mistakes happen.
He is a college graduate, so I doubt he will be mowing your lawn anytime soon, your son's allowance should be safe.
My disgust is certainly not with you or your post (facts or opinion). I could not be more sad to watch the information about any rider even questioned about drug use let alone caught, finding its way to print. The tests should be done on the sample completely both A,B and re-sample taken from the rider for cause. An A sample positive result should not be part of the process, the B sample should be tested and confirmed positive before the rider is notified(vilified) and more important before the press is contacted. A,B equals double checking things before ruining a racer. You even measure twice before cutting a chunk of wood in half let alone a person. Your point about being a college grad taking you off the lawn mowing list is plain wrong. People are being denied employment because of blogs they write,photo and video content on their facebook/myspace pages and certainly previous firings. When an employer googles Tom's name he will find that he was denied employment at Garmin due to a drug use conviction by a US based sports drug posse.