hrotha said:The thing is, I fail to see the relevance of our being Iberian.
hrotha said:Contador's attack was an anomaly. Normally he wouldn't be so out of the picture he'd decide to do something epic or die trying, so using something like that to praise the course is rather odd. Andy attacked exactly once, because that was how many times he thought he needed to attack. A course like this would definitely force him to attack more.
Waterloo Sunrise said:No one forced him to sign for an underfunded team, he had plenty of options.
N.b. I've just checked the 2010 result - Wiggins put 2 minutes in to him, starting only 30 mins earlier so not getting the wind benefit Tony & Fab got.
Not Bertie's finest year, clearly, but not Brad's either.
Ryo Hazuki said:2011 is definitely wiggins' best year to date
Bavarianrider said:I think it's a great situation. There's the Giro for the southeners who like their small, light pure climbers.
There's the Tour for the Northenern Euors Americans and Aussies who like the roleur types more. So everyone gets his share and a GT he or she likes.
Zinoviev Letter said:Presumably it's meant to imply a bias because such a route favours Contador. It doesn't make much sense though because any route favours Contador and such a route certainly doesn't favour the rest of the top Spanish GT riders.
Where you might see actual national bias (and I'm not accusing anyone here) is with certain Australian or British riders, because this route really would favour their local contenders.
roundabout said:Not really about Contador, but the idea that routes have to be made to force climbers to attack early instead of waiting for the MTF is somehow much more prevalent there.
Here climbers will have to be Pantani reincarnated and 1 successful long range attack won't be enough. Even in 1998 on a similarly woeful route Pantani won because Ullrich bonked.
roundabout said:I see 13 HC, 1 and 2 climbs in the Pyrenees when there should be 11. Even if Ares is ignored it's still 12.
What in the world are you talking about?????Bavarianrider said:I think it's a great situation. There's the Giro for the southeners who like their small, light pure climbers.
There's the Tour for the Northenern Euors Americans and Aussies who like the roleur types more. So everyone gets his share and a GT he or she likes.
The Hitch said:I guess some of us will have to remind people of Menchov many many times between now and July.
Wait, that's it? Whew, I was worried you were implying something bad.roundabout said:Not really about Contador, but the idea that routes have to be made to force climbers to attack early instead of waiting for the MTF is somehow much more prevalent there.
The Hitch said:I guess some of us will have to remind people of Menchov many many times between now and July.
WKA311 said:Just ridiculous, almost 2 weeks of cavendish winning and winning but maybe we see some real racing at the mountain stages with only 4 of it.
Podium: 1. A.Contador 2. C.Evans 3. B.Wiggins
Maybe in a different order but this are the 3 favourites for me![]()
Arnout said:Just like they did before this Giro, before this Vuelta indeed![]()
Ryo Hazuki said:one good thing about this route is how f'n in your face this is to andy schleck. any reaction from him yet? and that pig bruyneel?
Descender said:And why did Ullrich bonk? Anyone?
You're right about the overall idea and I personally stand by it. Cycling ought to be epic, not a flash-in-the-pan kind of sport. Let's leave that to other sports.
roundabout said:Because it was cold and he didn't like the rain???