El Pistolero said:No cobbles in Tournai I'm afraid
There's some hills around there, but I doubt they'll use them.
Oh thanks, well would have been to good to be true.
El Pistolero said:No cobbles in Tournai I'm afraid
There's some hills around there, but I doubt they'll use them.
Yeah we get it, you think Froome is clinic.Libertine Seguros said:Except Chris Froome will suddenly discover the ability to sit on the front and pace the péloton for 180km to set up the sprint for two weeks then climb better than Contador in the two stages that matter, and time trial better than Cancellara (again).
.
At least now they've moved the Tour de Pologne I might be able to watch that instead for one third of this crapfest
Bavarianrider said:Anyone familiar with the area of stage 3 and 4. Is there a chance for some significant cobles?
hrotha said:That's a bold prediction. I'm going to give this route the benefit of the doubt because I realize something has to be done about 95% of mountain stages becoming a 5-km showdown.
Zinoviev Letter said:It's actually reasonably important that there be a constant and loud chorus of fan disapproval if you want it to sink in over at ASO head office that nobody wants this kind of dullness.
Not because anyone with decision making power is likely to be reading any given internet discussion but because unremitting hostility on blogs and message boards will be reflected in the cycling media. The story becomes not "ASO unveil new route" but instead "ASO unveil new route to fan anger".
If that irritates or bores you, fair enough, but I'd prepare to be bored and/or irritated all the way from now until the 2013 course is announced if I were you.
Publicus said:Well looking at this route, I'm thinking Contador may try and go for the Giro-Tour double again.
hrotha said:That's a bold prediction. I'm going to give this route the benefit of the doubt because I realize something has to be done about 95% of mountain stages becoming a 5-km showdown.
Waterloo Sunrise said:He should just be thankful that 38km isn't a TTT. Although will Saxobank be allowed to ride if they can't field a full 9 man team?
Contador's attack was an anomaly. Normally he wouldn't be so out of the picture he'd decide to do something epic or die trying, so using something like that to praise the course is rather odd. Andy attacked exactly once, because that was how many times he thought he needed to attack. A course like this would definitely force him to attack more.Zinoviev Letter said:The easiest way to fix that is to give Contador a five minute penalty at the start of every race.
And anyway, at this year's Tour, the two best climbers in the world attacked way out on the two main mountain stages. That doesn't seem to me to need much fixing.
Waterloo Sunrise said:I think the fan anger angle is almost as delusional as the idea you rightly mock, that the ASO would give a flying monkey what anyone on this board thinks
I think changing the route is worth a try. Worst case scenario, we get a boring TdF. Oooh, never had one of those before.roundabout said:Yeah, in the era where there's less difference between top riders and their helpers that will definitely work.
The only good thing about this route is that it will forever shut up the people who think Pau-like stages do not work only because climbers lack the incentive to do something.
Bellegarde and Foix stages are absolute crap even if I was one of the people who thought that Grand Colombier and Biche should be in the Tour.
But I like the wishful thinking about this route especially over in the Iberian peninsula.
The Hitch said:He should be thankful his rivals arent given a headstart over him again?
hrotha said:I think changing the route is worth a try. Worst case scenario, we get a boring TdF. Oooh, never had one of those before.
To the bolded part: the hell are you talking about?
hrotha said:I think changing the route is worth a try. Worst case scenario, we get a boring TdF. Oooh, never had one of those before.
To the bolded part: the hell are you talking about?
roundabout said:You and Descender. APM they think it's a good route. Anyone else I missed?
What the hell am I talking about indeed...
Zinoviev Letter said:The easiest way to fix that is to give Contador a five minute penalty at the start of every race.
And anyway, at this year's Tour, the two best climbers in the world attacked way out on the two main mountain stages. That doesn't seem to me to need much fixing.
Rocksteady said:Garmins going to easily get their top ten this year. Maybe Millar or DZ if the stick with the "someone new every year" thing, though this course looks great for VDV.
Bavarianrider said:I think it's an pretty good route. The best since 07. The first TT should be 10km longer though. Prologue is also 2km too short
hrotha said:Contador's attack was an anomaly. Normally he wouldn't be so out of the picture he'd decide to do something epic or die trying, so using something like that to praise the course is rather odd. Andy attacked exactly once, because that was how many times he thought he needed to attack. A course like this would definitely force him to attack more.
The thing is, I fail to see the relevance of our being Iberian.roundabout said:You and Descender. APM they think it's a good route. Anyone else I missed?
What the hell am I talking about indeed...
And this is changing the route for the sake of changing the route. Too little mountains that matter and too much TT for those mountains is certainly worth a try.
hrotha said:The thing is, I fail to see the relevance of our being Iberian.
Waterloo Sunrise said:Come on, don't start trolling.