Re: Re:
Alexandre B. said:
rghysens said:
jflemaire said:
...
Also, people are down on Prudhomme but since 2014 it's actually Thierry Gouvenou who designs the route (taking over from Pescheux). Of course, Prrudhomme has to approuve it. But still..
Yeah, but why did he design a very entertaining course in 2014 (with a superb first half) and is it getting worse every year since? It isn't only due to the available terrain.
Riders were complaining that 2015 first week was too difficult, I guess that's why there is a step back.
Gouvenou's ultimate goal is to design a Tour without a single summit finish in the
grands massifs (Pyrenees, Alpes).
Well it could still be an interesting mountainous route without summit finishers (or at least just without hard MTF's).
The Tour often delights in A) a longish hard MTF, and more recently B) a finish almost directly off a long, steep descent. The former often restricts the amount of GC action in the stages surrounding it (as well as sometimes on the stage itself), whilst the latter increases the chances of crashes, which incidentally bunch sprint finishers do also.
What it would be good to see more of, is the HC/Cat 1 penultimate climb, followed by the Cat 2/3 finishing climb, so more of a hilltop finish. This reduces the chances of the negative factors that I mentioned above.
Even the Giro (which utilises this format the best/most) probably doesn't do it enough. For the Tour the best/most famous example would be the AX3-Domaines stage from 2013 (okay, the final climb is much harder than Cat 2, but still, much easier than the penultimate climb). Why aren't such final forty kms including more often in GT stages?