Tour de France 2017 stage 3: Verviers - Longwy 212,5 km

Page 13 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

Who will win the stage?

  • Greg van Avermaet

    Votes: 5 3.9%
  • Peter Sagan

    Votes: 51 40.2%
  • Sonny Colbrelli

    Votes: 9 7.1%
  • Michael Matthews

    Votes: 10 7.9%
  • Marcel Kittel

    Votes: 5 3.9%
  • Phillipe Gilbert

    Votes: 16 12.6%
  • Arnaud Demare

    Votes: 8 6.3%
  • John Degenkolb

    Votes: 1 0.8%
  • None of the above

    Votes: 12 9.4%
  • Vino-option

    Votes: 10 7.9%

  • Total voters
    127
  • Poll closed .
Re: Re:

infeXio said:
Valv.Piti said:
Yes, I genuinely wasn't that impressed with Sagan. Even with the unclip thats what you expect against this opposition when Bala and Alaphilippe aren't present.

Even with the unclip? :lol: :lol: What?! How does that even make sense.
Didn't you expect him to win despite him briefly unclipping considering he was still at the front?
 
Re: Re:

Valv.Piti said:
infeXio said:
Valv.Piti said:
Yes, I genuinely wasn't that impressed with Sagan. Even with the unclip thats what you expect against this opposition when Bala and Alaphilippe aren't present.

Even with the unclip? :lol: :lol: What?! How does that even make sense.
Didn't you expect him to win despite him brifly unclipping considering he was still at the front?

Well... no? The sheer momentum lost in such situation should be enough to consider it quite surprising that he was able to regain it.
 
Re: Re:

infeXio said:
Valv.Piti said:
infeXio said:
Valv.Piti said:
Yes, I genuinely wasn't that impressed with Sagan. Even with the unclip thats what you expect against this opposition when Bala and Alaphilippe aren't present.

Even with the unclip? :lol: :lol: What?! How does that even make sense.
Didn't you expect him to win despite him brifly unclipping considering he was still at the front?

Well... no? The sheer momentum lost in such situation should be enough to consider it quite surprising that he was able to regain it.
Okay, I did, so I guess we differ in opinion there.
 
Re: Re:

Valv.Piti said:
infeXio said:
Valv.Piti said:
Yes, I genuinely wasn't that impressed with Sagan. Even with the unclip thats what you expect against this opposition when Bala and Alaphilippe aren't present.

Even with the unclip? :lol: :lol: What?! How does that even make sense.
Didn't you expect him to win despite him briefly unclipping considering he was still at the front?

You're really serious?! Have you ever seen anybody unclip before in a finale of a big race in a sprint situation and still win? He really lost a lot of speed that he had to regain again, which obviously cost him a lot more than if he didn't waste a second by trying to get his foot back in. It may not seem like such big a deal when seeing it play out, but it definitely was.

The fact that he still managed to win was nothing short of miraculous in my opinion. Both from a technical and a physical viewpoint.
 
It was extremely impressive the way he managed to clip in immdediately, but psychically I wasn't too impressed conisdering how close Matthews got in the end. I think that stuff is what we have come to expect from Sagan since he is so great.

I know how it feels to be a Contador-fan now I guess. You tend to believe your guy had won, you know. :p
 
Re:

Valv.Piti said:
Yes, I genuinely wasn't that impressed with Sagan. Even with the unclip thats what you expect against this opposition when Bala and Alaphilippe aren't present.

Do I think Valverde would have won the stage? Yes
Is he the best puncheur in the world? Yes
Was it a shame for the race when he crashed out? Yes

I don't normally object to fanboying, but to start undermining Sagan's incredible victory because you are clearly still bitter about Valverde's crash is ridiculous. Appreciate when an incredibly talented rider rides in an incredibly talented manner, as we did today.
 
Re:

SeriousSam said:
Sagan's victory today certainly needs an asterisk next to it, due to Valverde's unfortunate crash

And a second asterisk for the unclipping. When I watched the finish for the first time, I only noticed that Sagan seemed to hesitate. Being able to recover momentum after unclipping shows real strength.

True, the finish was ideal for Alex and certainly reminded me of their duel in the Vuelta a couple of years back.
 
You expect great things from incredible riders like Sagan, so its not like Im sitting here stunned over his performance or anything. I think a few posters mentioned what I more or less said earlier:

Irondan said:
DFA123 said:
Considering how close Martin got, you've got to think Valverde would have won this by 50m.
Without a doubt.

This was Valverde's stage to lose.
Its obviously all hypothetical. Still, a good win.
 
Well, obviously we disagree on that point (with whether or not Sagan's performance was out of this world).

But I would also argue that we can perhaps flip it and be impressed by Matthews' strength instead of disappointed by Sagan's (which is unfair to be IMO). He (Matthews) looked to be suffering quite early but came really fast in the end. Greg looked surprisingly weak though what with him being outsprinted by Martin, so it's a bit difficult to measure, really.
 
Wanna hear something funny? Greg says that Sagan's unclipping cost him the victory...

"It was too far to keep sprinting flat out. In a straight duel, it was hard to beat him. I chose to get back on his wheel but I failed to hold onto it. It's a pity that he lost his pedal. Otherwise, I maybe could've gotten in his slipstream and - who knows - maybe even pass him. He was the strongest rider out there. Everything had to go perfectly. I'm pleased with how I did it," Van Avermaet said.

One of the dumber things I've heard in a while. Or Sagan is just superior tactically, deliberately unclipping so as making it disadvantageous to enter his slipstream... Next level tactics!
 
Mar 15, 2016
520
0
0
Re:

tobydawq said:
Wanna hear something funny? Greg says that Sagan's unclipping cost him the victory...

"It was too far to keep sprinting flat out. In a straight duel, it was hard to beat him. I chose to get back on his wheel but I failed to hold onto it. It's a pity that he lost his pedal. Otherwise, I maybe could've gotten in his slipstream and - who knows - maybe even pass him. He was the strongest rider out there. Everything had to go perfectly. I'm pleased with how I did it," Van Avermaet said.

One of the dumber things I've heard in a while. Or Sagan is just superior tactically, deliberately unclipping so as making it disadvantageous to enter his slipstream... Next level tactics!

Going by this logic Martin has reason to feel aggrieved by Sagan's unclip as he would have clearly passed GvA.

Matthews even more so as he would have passed them all and won.

Belongs in that "Things cyclist say" thread that appeared some time ago.
 
Mar 13, 2015
949
0
0
Re: Re:

willbick said:
happytramp said:
Brullnux said:
rhubroma said:
I think Porte will win on Weds.
Likely, with Froome on his wheel and Aru slogging it out a few seconds back. Contador, Fugslang and Bardet all in the mix too, and Quintana just behind Froome or with Aru.

The extent to which Martin is forgotten about/underestimated on this forum never ceases to amaze.

Its because he's British (yeah yeah irish but u know) and has an ungainly style

British riders are the most talked about on this forum :confused:
 
Re: Re:

trucido said:
tobydawq said:
Wanna hear something funny? Greg says that Sagan's unclipping cost him the victory...

"It was too far to keep sprinting flat out. In a straight duel, it was hard to beat him. I chose to get back on his wheel but I failed to hold onto it. It's a pity that he lost his pedal. Otherwise, I maybe could've gotten in his slipstream and - who knows - maybe even pass him. He was the strongest rider out there. Everything had to go perfectly. I'm pleased with how I did it," Van Avermaet said.

One of the dumber things I've heard in a while. Or Sagan is just superior tactically, deliberately unclipping so as making it disadvantageous to enter his slipstream... Next level tactics!

Going by this logic Martin has reason to feel aggrieved by Sagan's unclip as he would have clearly passed GvA.

Matthews even more so as he would have passed them all and won.

Belongs in that "Things cyclist say" thread that appeared some time ago.

Indeed! I found the thread and put it there.
 
Jul 3, 2017
20
0
0
Re: Re:

Eagle said:
willbick said:
happytramp said:
Brullnux said:
rhubroma said:
I think Porte will win on Weds.
Likely, with Froome on his wheel and Aru slogging it out a few seconds back. Contador, Fugslang and Bardet all in the mix too, and Quintana just behind Froome or with Aru.

The extent to which Martin is forgotten about/underestimated on this forum never ceases to amaze.

I have just joined after 3 years of enjoyably reading this forum to say I am equally amazed.

I had a tenner on DM today (unfortunately not e/w) due to the ludicrous price he was available at - 50/1 on Paddy Power (an Irish owned company).

Its not just this forum or the bookies, look above at the poll, no mention of DM.

Equally other sites reviewed the stage selected the contenders and again no mention. Inrng had 11 riders tipped, not one was DM. Now this maybe all well in hindsight but todays result was predictabl, it was most likely that DM would be in the running.

Just think of the reasoning, there was internet wide consensus that Valverde would win it, but somehow the internet consensus didn't seem to take into account who has been his shadow for most of this seasons wins - DM. If Valverde wasn't in the race then surely it doesn't take a huge leap to assume that in his abscene the guy who has come second to him on this terrain would perform. In addition DM had form in last years Cherbourg stage and multiple high placings in the Flèche - today was a gentler Flèche route. It genuinely is weird how overlooked he is.

Anyway aside from that thanks to all regular contributors for my schooling in cycling tactics and strategies that I've learnt about over the past three years on here.
 
Re: Re:

Eagle said:
willbick said:
happytramp said:
Brullnux said:
rhubroma said:
I think Porte will win on Weds.
Likely, with Froome on his wheel and Aru slogging it out a few seconds back. Contador, Fugslang and Bardet all in the mix too, and Quintana just behind Froome or with Aru.

The extent to which Martin is forgotten about/underestimated on this forum never ceases to amaze.

Its because he's British (yeah yeah irish but u know) and has an ungainly style

British riders are the most talked about on this forum :confused:

Sky riders are the most talked about on this forum. It's not the same thing.
 

KGB

Apr 16, 2015
480
0
0
Re:

tobydawq said:
Wanna hear something funny? Greg says that Sagan's unclipping cost him the victory...

"It was too far to keep sprinting flat out. In a straight duel, it was hard to beat him. I chose to get back on his wheel but I failed to hold onto it. It's a pity that he lost his pedal. Otherwise, I maybe could've gotten in his slipstream and - who knows - maybe even pass him. He was the strongest rider out there. Everything had to go perfectly. I'm pleased with how I did it," Van Avermaet said.

One of the dumber things I've heard in a while. Or Sagan is just superior tactically, deliberately unclipping so as making it disadvantageous to enter his slipstream... Next level tactics!
GVA is specialist to follow Sagan wheel.If he get his wheel and is able to follow then is big chance he will win it.
 
Re: Re:

Eagle said:
willbick said:
happytramp said:
Brullnux said:
rhubroma said:
I think Porte will win on Weds.
Likely, with Froome on his wheel and Aru slogging it out a few seconds back. Contador, Fugslang and Bardet all in the mix too, and Quintana just behind Froome or with Aru.

The extent to which Martin is forgotten about/underestimated on this forum never ceases to amaze.

Its because he's British (yeah yeah irish but u know) and has an ungainly style

British riders are the most talked about on this forum :confused:

Did Alberto suddenly changed citizenship? :lol: 45000 posts in his thread alone no one else even close.
 
Re: Re:

cantpedal said:
Eagle said:
willbick said:
happytramp said:
Brullnux said:
Likely, with Froome on his wheel and Aru slogging it out a few seconds back. Contador, Fugslang and Bardet all in the mix too, and Quintana just behind Froome or with Aru.

The extent to which Martin is forgotten about/underestimated on this forum never ceases to amaze.

Its because he's British (yeah yeah irish but u know) and has an ungainly style

British riders are the most talked about on this forum :confused:

Did Alberto suddenly changed citizenship? :lol: 45000 posts in his thread alone no one else even close.

You have to minus the 27,638 posts from LaFlorecita :lol:
 
Re: Re:

happytramp said:
The extent to which Martin is forgotten about/underestimated on this forum never ceases to amaze.

It's easy to say with hindsight. I think a lot of posters underestimated the difficulty of the final climb (I did to a slight extent). Riders like Sagan, Matthews and GvA were picked because they are the obvious standout riders in their team for this terrain. In Quick-Step there are several. Gilbert looked to be in good form in the TT and I thought that the final hill was not too difficult for him. Some underestimated the climb to a greater extent and picked Trentin (certainly a reasonable choice).

On finishes like these, it is quite common to have a couple of riders from one team in the top 5, but the mind often works in a way that precludes such a prediction. So Gilbert was my guy from Quick-Step (so maybe overestimating Gilbert than underestimating Martin?)
 
Re: Re:

tobydawq said:
Valv.Piti said:
infeXio said:
Valv.Piti said:
Yes, I genuinely wasn't that impressed with Sagan. Even with the unclip thats what you expect against this opposition when Bala and Alaphilippe aren't present.

Even with the unclip? :lol: :lol: What?! How does that even make sense.
Didn't you expect him to win despite him briefly unclipping considering he was still at the front?

You're really serious?! Have you ever seen anybody unclip before in a finale of a big race in a sprint situation and still win? He really lost a lot of speed that he had to regain again, which obviously cost him a lot more than if he didn't waste a second by trying to get his foot back in. It may not seem like such big a deal when seeing it play out, but it definitely was.

The fact that he still managed to win was nothing short of miraculous in my opinion. Both from a technical and a physical viewpoint.

Pah. I saw this one guy unclip going over the top of the final climb of the 2015 World Championship, and he didn't break rhythm or anything, just clipped back in and won the rainbow jersey. I bet that guy wouldve won the Longwy stage if he was there.
 
Unclipping.
DD17ivrXoAAONOR.jpg
 
Re: Re:

Leinster said:
tobydawq said:
Valv.Piti said:
infeXio said:
Valv.Piti said:
Yes, I genuinely wasn't that impressed with Sagan. Even with the unclip thats what you expect against this opposition when Bala and Alaphilippe aren't present.

Even with the unclip? :lol: :lol: What?! How does that even make sense.
Didn't you expect him to win despite him briefly unclipping considering he was still at the front?

You're really serious?! Have you ever seen anybody unclip before in a finale of a big race in a sprint situation and still win? He really lost a lot of speed that he had to regain again, which obviously cost him a lot more than if he didn't waste a second by trying to get his foot back in. It may not seem like such big a deal when seeing it play out, but it definitely was.

The fact that he still managed to win was nothing short of miraculous in my opinion. Both from a technical and a physical viewpoint.

Pah. I saw this one guy unclip going over the top of the final climb of the 2015 World Championship, and he didn't break rhythm or anything, just clipped back in and won the rainbow jersey. I bet that guy wouldve won the Longwy stage if he was there.

Ha! Funny you should mention that. Originally, I had that as a parenthesis as another example but I deleted it and changed the premise to a sprint-like situation because I didn't want people coming up with stupid examples such as Gilbert or Rosa...