On the bright side he has plenty of staminaHard to get rid of him when positive and negative signals are received so differently.
On the bright side he has plenty of staminaHard to get rid of him when positive and negative signals are received so differently.
On the bright side he has plenty of stamina
Yeah they make racing worse I think.Not as a result of today, but I'm starting not to be that much of a fan of bonus seconds at the end of stages.
Agree with all of you that they may be worse. In today's case they didn't have any real impact, though.Not as a result of today, but I'm starting not to be that much of a fan of bonus seconds at the end of stages.
Landa is a bird who wanted out of his cage, now he's sitting on a branch next to the open window of the sleeping room of the siblings who owned him.
Might as well make it stage 2 while you are at itNah. Could have gone worse. Like start in bourg-saint-maurice, and then do col de la loze, Madeleine, croix de fer and finish on alpe d'huez. Watch them all suffer.
I originally was going to blame Sepp Kuss for Roglic not winning the Tour but that would be discounting Podocar's absolutely amazing performance in the time trial.
But I still think that Sepp Kuss did weaken his team leader at a crucial point by unnecessarily attacking him at the end of one of the most brutal and physically taxing stages of the race.
First let's acknowledge that Roglic probably wasn't 100% coming into the tour because of his crash at Dauphine leading up to the tour. Then Roglic spent three weeks at the tour constantly near the front at probably the fastest pace in the post doping era, contesting stage wins and often even attacking himself. This was a worn out team leader by the time we even got to stage 17. Then, near the end of stage 17, after all those hard climbs his own teammate attacks him and sets up another contending rider from a different team for the stage win! Podocar, riding without teammates, felt no obligation to follow and rode at his own pace. Meanwhile Kuss rode Roglic into the ground for no good reason.
The most surprising thing to me about Kuss's attack on Roglic was that initially after the stage every "expert" commentator I heard gave Kuss credit and thought he had done great work in his attack because it extended Roglic's lead over Podocar by a small amount. But at what cost? While Roglic felt obligated to follow Kuss's attack, Podocar eased off a little and saved his energy for the time trial. Podocar, riding without teammates, felt no obligation to follow and rode at his own pace. which set him up for excellent recovery going into the TT. Meanwhile Sepp rode Roglic into the ground for no good reason.
Understanding the psychology of team racing is what makes the effects of Kuss's attack so effective at weakening Roglic for the final time trial. If you are the team leader and want to gain time on 2nd place, you feel more obligated to make something or of your teammates work if he is attacking on the front. It's very unlikely Roglic would have put in this extreme effort on his own to gain a few seconds on Podocar at the finish had Kuss not attacked. Sepp essentially obligated Roglic to put in this extreme effort, and Roglic, with his stubbornly hard work ethic, obliged him. But at what cost? Podocar is younger, recovered better, and saved it for the TT.
If Sepp doesn't attack his team leader at this crucial point it's possible Roglic would have recovered better and been stronger in the TT and lost the stage by only around a minute and wins the tour by seconds. We will never know but Sepp Kuss's attack on his team leader at the end of stage 17 was the biggest mistake by Jumbo Visma in this year's tour and was a super domestique sin.
No way did Kuss attack himself it was definitely under instruction. Whether this was through hubris and thinking they could afford to gift him the stage or some sort of a tactical move to get others to pull for the stage win is debatable but I'm sure it wasn't just Kuss going on a Landaesque mad one.I originally was going to blame Sepp Kuss for Roglic not winning the Tour but that would be discounting Podocar's absolutely amazing performance in the time trial.
But I still think that Sepp Kuss did weaken his team leader at a crucial point by unnecessarily attacking him at the end of one of the most brutal and physically taxing stages of the race.
First let's acknowledge that Roglic probably wasn't 100% coming into the tour because of his crash at Dauphine leading up to the tour. Then Roglic spent three weeks at the tour constantly near the front at probably the fastest pace in the post doping era, contesting stage wins and often even attacking himself. This was a worn out team leader by the time we even got to stage 17. Then, near the end of stage 17, after all those hard climbs his own teammate attacks him and sets up another contending rider from a different team for the stage win! Podocar, riding without teammates, felt no obligation to follow and rode at his own pace. Meanwhile Kuss rode Roglic into the ground for no good reason.
The most surprising thing to me about Kuss's attack on Roglic was that initially after the stage every "expert" commentator I heard gave Kuss credit and thought he had done great work in his attack because it extended Roglic's lead over Podocar by a small amount. But at what cost? While Roglic felt obligated to follow Kuss's attack, Podocar eased off a little and saved his energy for the time trial. Podocar, riding without teammates, felt no obligation to follow and rode at his own pace. which set him up for excellent recovery going into the TT. Meanwhile Sepp rode Roglic into the ground for no good reason.
Understanding the psychology of team racing is what makes the effects of Kuss's attack so effective at weakening Roglic for the final time trial. If you are the team leader and want to gain time on 2nd place, you feel more obligated to make something or of your teammates work if he is attacking on the front. It's very unlikely Roglic would have put in this extreme effort on his own to gain a few seconds on Podocar at the finish had Kuss not attacked. Sepp essentially obligated Roglic to put in this extreme effort, and Roglic, with his stubbornly hard work ethic, obliged him. But at what cost? Podocar is younger, recovered better, and saved it for the TT.
If Sepp doesn't attack his team leader at this crucial point it's possible Roglic would have recovered better and been stronger in the TT and lost the stage by only around a minute and wins the tour by seconds. We will never know but Sepp Kuss's attack on his team leader at the end of stage 17 was the biggest mistake by Jumbo Visma in this year's tour and was a super domestique sin.
Pogacar was going full gas.Problem with your dissertation is that Pogacar was going full gas - He wasn't saving himself for the ITT.
It looks like Roglic really didn't want to win this race, then.Roglič instructed Kuss to attack so as to deprive Roglič of the time bonus.
I know it sounds counterintuitive but apparently it makes more sense in Dutch.It looks like Roglic really didn't want to win this race, then.![]()
And ...
- Roglic told Kuss to attack to put pressure on Pog.
- Roglic then still could have stayed with Pog as there was zero need to follow MAL. It was 100% Roglic's choice to attack.
- Pogacar did not save hinself for the TT. If anything he blew hinself up trying to catch Roglic before he lost like 20 seconds in the very last ramp.
- That little 1km effort to drop Pog did not lose Roglic a minute. I'd actually argue it didn't cost him a single second. It's the general fatigue that's an issue for Roglic's 3rd week TT's, not one particular effort of which he has put in dozens in this tour.
I gave a (half-joking) personal definition of what I consider to be the "post doping era" a couple of years ago. It didn't last long, but realistically this is a conversation that shouldn't be had in this part of the forum.And ...
- The OP mentioned the fastest tour of the post doping era. When did that era start?
- Is this thread serious or a joke?
I'm definitely in favour of scapegoating Sepp Kuss.