• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Tour de France 2020 | Stage 6 (Le Teil - Mont Aigoual, 191 km)

Page 18 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Clipboard.jpg
 
You are missing the point.

Putting injured captains into the red today, means you have an even better chance Saturday.

Instead you are giving them 2 extra days to recover.
Yup. If Roglic/Bernal are still carrying/feeling any effects of injuries from the Dauphine, then by any other teams NOT attacking them today is giving them an extra rest day.

The question is, who would those other teams be, though? You expect EF or UAE to go for it? Bora?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Broccolidwarf
You are missing the point.

Putting injured captains into the red today, means you have an even better chance Saturday.

Instead you are giving them 2 extra days to recover.

You are missing point...

Today has surely cost something, even if they didnt attack each other. It sure tired some people out. Both some of the captains and domestics, that might just had enough to stay with the group today. That might drop on Saturday for just a small shift in pace up Port Bales for example. Saturday was always gonna be the real test this week to see who is still in contention going into 2nd week.

To put someone into red today you would probably had to put yourself into red, a maximum effort. For what? 20s. Makes no sense. They are managing their efforts to have the most energy where it will count the most. No one is truly that much better than anyone else that they can just attack and attack. It costs too much. Easier to just have them drop on a stage because they gone into red so many times to just stick with.
 
Porte wouldn't try anything if he had a DS committee consisting of Jacky Durand, Vino and the ghost of Frank Vandenbroucke.

Haha! :D

Yea, because Peyresourde stages with descent finishes have opened huge time gaps in recent years? Fingers crossed it's better than 2016...

when have MTFs opened up huge time gaps...? at least a descent gives a chance for an attacking rider (Ala) to hold a gap and even increase it...

And if you want time gaps... how about an ITT? that would then force climbers to have to attack on more stages...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Salvarani
Porte wouldn't try anything if he had a DS committee consisting of Jacky Durand, Vino and the ghost of Frank Vandenbroucke.

Yea, because Peyresourde stages with descent finishes have opened huge time gaps in recent years? Fingers crossed it's better than 2016...

The stage finish design was fine, Mont Aigoual after Lusette is fine. The issue was taking the tempo round from Le Vigan that cut the start of the steeper col out, and refusing to add any lead-in climbs, in an area where they almost had to work harder to find flat roads than they would have done to create an infinitely better stage where the riders weren't all just hitting Lusette completely fresh.
I suppose Porte could have wasted his energy like Aru did.
 
Maybe he was on a bad day? JV never even went to the front or even showed themselves. Later we may hear his legs weren't there.

He always does an interview for the national TV after the stage. He said the group ahead was strong so they realised they would simply waste too much energy by catching the break. He added that is also early, only stage 6 and that saving energy is more important than chasing stage wins.

Basically, reading between the lines - they don't want yellow yet - and gaining anything today would mean just that. I think they will try to make a selection on stage 8.
 
Porte wouldn't try anything if he had a DS committee consisting of Jacky Durand, Vino and the ghost of Frank Vandenbroucke.

Yea, because Peyresourde stages with descent finishes have opened huge time gaps in recent years? Fingers crossed it's better than 2016...

The stage finish design was fine, Mont Aigoual after Lusette is fine. The issue was taking the tempo round from Le Vigan that cut the start of the steeper col out, and refusing to add any lead-in climbs, in an area where they almost had to work harder to find flat roads than they would have done to create an infinitely better stage where the riders weren't all just hitting Lusette completely fresh.
Looking at the riders, slightly changing the lead in wouldn't have changed anything.
 
Mollema: "Bernal told Kwiat to go easy at the end when Alaphilippe was sprinting"

Ineos went surely relatively easy all the time.
The problem is that JV and perhaps Ineos have a really strong team for the late part, so noone dared to attack. I can somehow understand that, but it is really boring for us. Normally nothing happens on Saturday and Sunday, too. They will just ride a normal tempo. Nevertheless they shouldn't let Ineos slow everything down, but it will get boring again :)
 
You are missing point...

Today has surely cost something, even if they didnt attack each other. It sure tired some people out. Both some of the captains and domestics, that might just had enough to stay with the group today. That might drop on Saturday for just a small shift in pace up Port Bales for example. Saturday was always gonna be the real test this week to see who is still in contention going into 2nd week.

To put someone into red today you would probably had to put yourself into red, a maximum effort. For what? 20s. Makes no sense. They are managing their efforts to have the most energy where it will count the most. No one is truly that much better than anyone else that they can just attack and attack. It costs too much. Easier to just have them drop on a stage because they gone into red so many times to just stick with.
Broccolidwarf has a point though.

If Bernal or Roglic is hurting now from their Dauphine injuries, or Pinot from his crash on stage 1, then to respond to attacks now will be an effort that will cost them on Saturday and Sunday, when riders on other teams will have to attack them.

If Bernal and Roglic don't have to respond to attacks now, they will be better rested to deal with those Saturday and Sunday attacks.

By not attacking today, whichever GC riders were planning on attacking on Saturday made their attacks less effective. particularly, say, Trek or EF, who have 2 or more riders still within a minute of yellow, who can afford to burn one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pantani_lives
He always does an interview for the national TV after the stage. He said the group ahead was strong so they realised they would simply waste too much energy by catching the break. He added that is also early, only stage 6 and that saving energy is more important than chasing stage wins.

Basically, reading between the lines - they don't want yellow yet - and gaining anything today would mean just that. I think they will try to make a selection on stage 8.

Thanks. Kuss was interviewed on my USA station and he said basically the same thing. Strong break, save energy it'll take to much out out us to gain a few seconds, there is plenty of hard stages to come.