I mean sure, maybe I should have phrased it better, my point is that people saw JV being stronger than Ineos at the Dauphine and immediately concluded JV is just stronger in general. It's just not that simple.
Well, it's not that I would not think Kwiatkowski is not an amazing rider "in general". But he does not seem to be at his best. Hasn't last year. And this year just does not seem any better, although he had said it was his training and goals gone wrong last year.
Jumbo were not just strong at the Dauphiné, they were absolutely dominating in an almost unbelievable way. It was not just one rider, but literally all of them. When the other teams had one rider left they still had four or five. They won 3 of 5 stages with 3 different riders. Even with Kruiswijk out there is not one of their riders who seems out of shape or not ready, apart from Roglic, being heavily bruised. They did not have George Bennett with them who is in top-form himself, but is said to be outclimbed during their camp by van Aert!
In cycling I would never say "this is going to happen" (well, I finally was with Evenepoel in Lombardia, see how that turned out...) or "this is never going to happen". But I can't see how you would not be totally behind the idea that Jumbo looks way superior, even if they brought in Carapaz, who, by the way, was like 8 minutes behind Bennett in Lombardia. I know, three weeks... But the Dauphiné and Lombardia were only two weeks from the Tour, that is not a whole era.