oh, just trying to trigger a reaction. nothing bad meant by it.
however, i do dislike how all the petite climbers are now always in the conversation as GT favorites. they simply shouldn't be if the route tests what GTs are supposed to test.
and that is why i like the TDF the most because it rarely is won by anyone but the best all-rounder. even though they continue to try by shortening distances and eliminating almost all ITT.
i am one who does not need the TDF to be close to be exciting. i have always marveled and enjoyed the great rides of individual riders.
besides, if you put petite climbers in a hole, they're then forced to attack from further out which actually makes racing more exciting (bernal in the vuelta). if you have only one short ITT at the end of the race, you encourage racing so as not to lose rather than trying to win. you have riders waiting to the last few hundred meters of an MTF to win or lose by just a few seconds. i would argue that in trying to favor petite climbers in GT routes with the aim of making things close and suspenseful almost always backfires. it leads to even more defensive and less attacking racing.
my 2 cents.
PS. Bernal is a terrific rider, gifted. He is hardly exciting however, does not have any explosivity and requires an extreme route (almost no ITT and lots of high altitude) and the failure of true top all-rounders to prevail. not exactly what I enjoy in my GT winner...