The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
To give my 2 cents about this too, I might be wrong but what that article is describing simply isn't the simpson paradox right? If my memory serves me right the simpson paradox is a very well defined one and just because something sounds vaguely like the outcome of that paradox that doesn't make it the same paradox (though I really don't think paradox is even the correct word for the sagan case).No doubt there are better climbers than Geschke. But we’ve all watched racing long enough to know how these things work. Do we really think Peter Sagan was the best sprinter all those years he won he green jersey? He always consistently finished near the top and that’s one way to win it.
Peter Sagan and Simpson's Paradox: How the 'worst' sprinter keeps winning the green jersey
Despite not winning a stage, Peter Sagan (Tinkoff-Saxo) was undoubtedly one of the most impressive performers at this year’s Tour de France. His remarkable consistency (12 top-10 finishes) earned him the green ‘sprinters jersey’, despite changes to the points classification designed to favour...cyclingtips.com
Armstrong has a point, of course. But he is also seems most himself when he’s trashing something or someone. We all know the type.
Good point. The flag was so big it was hard to see what was underneathWas that a castle or a keep?
To give my 2 cents about this too, I might be wrong but what that article is describing simply isn't the simpson paradox right? If my memory serves me right the simpson paradox is a very well defined one and just because something sounds vaguely like the outcome of that paradox that doesn't make it the same paradox (though I really don't think paradox is even the correct word for the sagan case).
Wout working for Laporte? Or riding 8km and winning himself
As far as I remember, Simpson's paradox, which also goes by several other names, is a phenomenon in probability and statistics in which a trend appears in several groups of data but disappears or reverses when the groups are combined. This result is often encountered in social-science and medical-science statistics,[1][2][3] and is particularly problematic when frequency data are unduly given causal interpretations.[4] The paradox can be resolved when confounding variables and causal relations are appropriately addressed in the statistical modeling.[4][5] Simpson's paradox has been used to illustrate the kind of misleading results that the misuse of statistics can generate.[6][7]To give my 2 cents about this too, I might be wrong but what that article is describing simply isn't the simpson paradox right? If my memory serves me right the simpson paradox is a very well defined one and just because something sounds vaguely like the outcome of that paradox that doesn't make it the same paradox (though I really don't think paradox is even the correct word for the sagan case).
Something for Kristoff!Nice to see they added a slalom stage this year.
JV scared of crashes?
Wout working for Laporte? Or riding 8km and winning himself
Van Aert not sprinting today.
Rolf says 12 seconds.