- Oct 14, 2020
- 1,139
- 2,112
- 8,680
Or a bit more points on cat 2/3/4. I think last year they had double points on MTFs, but that that was removed this year to re-balance the KOMpetition a bit.
He wasn't strictly going for the KOM jersey, but he was going for results on the hardest climbs, which give the most KOM points. It would be like a rider going for a bunch of sprint and hilly stage wins, but not caring about the intermediate sprints, and then winning the points jersey. Yes he wasn't trolling for points all the time, but going for stage wins nets a lot of points.
And would you rather go for polka-dots or the Green?But I still feel for Geschke being so close, only to miss out.
Meanwhile, all of Pogacar's helpers were caught behind. But they caught up again.
But I still feel for Geschke being so close, only to miss out.
The gay movement started with a full on large scale riot and carried out frequent disruptions of all kinds of events and institutions. A history of its most famous and militant institution, ACT-UP, has recently been published if you are interested. Successful social movements aiming at significant changes don’t ask politely.What damage did the gay movement cause?
No doubt there are better climbers than Geschke. But we’ve all watched racing long enough to know how these things work. Do we really think Peter Sagan was the best sprinter all those years he won he green jersey? He always consistently finished near the top and that’s one way to win it.
![]()
Peter Sagan and Simpson's Paradox: How the 'worst' sprinter keeps winning the green jersey
Despite not winning a stage, Peter Sagan (Tinkoff-Saxo) was undoubtedly one of the most impressive performers at this year’s Tour de France. His remarkable consistency (12 top-10 finishes) earned him the green ‘sprinters jersey’, despite changes to the points classification designed to favour...cyclingtips.com
Armstrong has a point, of course. But he is also seems most himself when he’s trashing something or someone. We all know the type.
That was a strange article. The tie to Simpson's paradox was forced and not useful.
I think the entire article could have been summed up by saying that being a good sprinter and scoring points are correlated, but that Sagan races to maximize points even if he's not technically the fastest sprinter. It's a bit like saying how winning Majors in tennis and winning a lot of ranking points are correlated, but that it's not weird for someone to finish ATP #1 at the end of the year if they don't win the most Majors but instead maximized points across the season.
Sir, we just had an attack on the yellow jersey!There used to be six or seven boring stages like this one.
There used to be six or seven boring stages like this one.
