Time will tell but one thing I know, Vingegaard agrees with me.Thats a very positive interpretation (from Pogacar's point)...
Time will tell but one thing I know, Vingegaard agrees with me.Thats a very positive interpretation (from Pogacar's point)...
But true, since Pogacar actually did attack and try to gap Vingegaard - he just couldn't today.Thats a very positive interpretation (from Pogacar's point)...
His attack and Vingegaards reaction really looked like it was last years Tour again. That said, I don't think we should interpret too much into this. Power dynamics shift slightly from day to day. That's nothing new.They were both too fresh. Pogacar has more anaerobic capacity, so it's not like Vingegaard can accelerate him off the wheel. But Pogacar didn't have the snap on his attack to put 1cm into Vingegaard unlike every time before.
I think having Yates go up the road was a ploy to bait Vingo into chasing, setting him up for the counter in the final couple hundred kilometers.
So plenty of time for Vinge to defend and possibly to extend his lead?There isn't though. There's the TT in Tuesday, Loze on Wednesday and we've a stage I don't expect much gaps in in Saturday (unless they attack on Petit Balloon). Wednesday will likely be the decider now so you've basically put it down to who's strongest on on day. He looked stronger today and left that go.
slight, but Jumbo's day-long hard pacing appears to be working to soften Pog's ability to accelerate.UAE is proving to have the upper hand in the high mountain stages
WOW, that's fast.You have to acknowledge that Poels climbed the final climb about 10 billion times faster than the rest of the breakaway.
Poels absolutely destroyed them. By far the best on the day, quite incredible performance honestly. But good on the TV crew for not wasting too much time showing a rider that had already won.You have to acknowledge that Poels climbed the final climb about 10 billion times faster than the rest of the breakaway.
Looked more like he was leaving space for a run-up.I really think Pogacar did not look good. Left some weird 1-2m gaps to Vingegaard behind Rodriguez and for the first time also couldn't gap Vingegaard for even a second.
So even if the Yates move was intentional, Vingegaard might have wasted an opportunity by being too passive.
You have to acknowledge that Poels climbed the final climb about 10 billion times faster than the rest of the breakaway.
Gall and Yates again dropped in the downhill![]()
I dunno. I think that tactic looks odd enough that it causes you to question things more than if Yates rode an easy tempo and buys you time then. To me it looked bad for Pogacar but I can get why you'd question it. I think it was clear Pogacar wasnt good after Rodriguez caught back up and then his attack was so normal, Vingegaard should have gone then.If Pog had been in trouble, no way would Yates have ridden away.
I mean, what should he say? "Pogacar was weak today, I saw it but I just decided to keep him in the race"?Time will tell but one thing I know, Vingegaard agrees with me.
Because Rodriguez was surging.I really think Pogacar did not look good. Left some weird 1-2m gaps to Vingegaard behind Rodriguez and for the first time also couldn't gap Vingegaard for even a second.
So even if the Yates move was intentional, Vingegaard might have wasted an opportunity by being too passive.
I already thought he does extremly well following the GPS gap. Again, didn't think he still had this in him.Poels did the final climb faster than all but 5 of the GC guys?
Snooker can be quite thrilling, too. However I've never seen an electrical fence at a tournament yet (even though some fans could deserve corporal punishement), so it may not be the right sport for you. It's also a numbers game which could make it tricky for you. Yellow isn't the most important ball either which might confuse you as well.Okay, in my next life, I think I'll be a snooker fan, or something like that.
My nerves can't handle this.