It's not that relevant to remco if the Tour put a lot of TT in the route. Pogacar and vingegaard in the Tour look like tony martin and cancellara in the TTs. So remco wouldn't be able to make great differences for both.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Prudhomme isn't subtle about his distaste for time trialing. If the Tour comes out with a route loaded with ITTs, then the power of Remco is real.
noDoes anyone believe Remco will skip the Tour for years to come if it doesn't have enough time trialing?
That would be really sad. Given the start in Italy and the finish in Nice, they actually could have created the best/most exciting Tour route in ages. But I'm pretty sure they will waste that opportunity even if it didn't include a large amount of ITT to satisfy Remco. Short mountain stages and too much focus on big/steep MTFs will probably be the result.2024 is supposed to be "Remco friendly" so more tt kms less big mountain stages (nothing over 150 km) and plenty of sprint/breakaway days so the GC guys can rest and give up the yellow jersey.
The most interesting thing might well be those 3 first stages in Italy (over 200km a first since 2017). I pity the people in western France who will probably not see a Tour stage there until France comes up with a sprinter worthy of the name.
Yep, that's always the annoying thing that it should not be difficult to get a really good Tour, but every year it's like Charlie Brown, Lucy and the football.That would be really sad. Given the start in Italy and the finish in Nice, they actually could have created the best/most exciting Tour route in ages. But I'm pretty sure they will waste that opportunity even if it didn't include a large amount of ITT to satisfy Remco. Short mountain stages and too much focus on big/steep MTFs will probably be the result.
I completely disagree. We've had a lot of great races. You say Roubaix is decided by a mechanical, but what does that have to do with the rest of the race? It was still a great race. This season has been amazing so far, except for the Giro. But that was because Remco had to leave early so there was no reason for INEOS and Jumbo to attack since they both just relied on their TT.I think the underlying issue is that this season has been pretty disappointing so far.
I totally agree. Sure, the last 15 k or so of Roubaix was a snooze fest but the rest of that race was exciting. I thought the Ronde van Vlaanderen was one of the most exciting monuments I have ever seen. We had a 2x Tour de France champion riding against probably the best monuments rider of this generation. Was the final 5 k or so kind of boring? Sure but come on, we don't watch racing for 6 hours of endless excitement. Then for the nonstop complaining, I thought Stage 20 of the Giro was one of the most exciting time trials I have ever seen. Throw in the fact that it felt like an Olympic Games hosted by Slovenia with the flags, party atmosphere. Great racing. Even Milan-San Remo was exciting, with the opposite result of Flanders. I think it's been one of the best years of racing. I suppose we've become spoiled the last few years with exciting grand tours and GC guys that ride classics and monuments.I completely disagree. We've had a lot of great races. You say Roubaix is decided by a mechanical, but what does that have to do with the rest of the race? It was still a great race. This season has been amazing so far, except for the Giro. But that was because Remco had to leave early so there was no reason for INEOS and Jumbo to attack since they both just relied on their TT.
Alps are the final block again. I guess we'll get a soft Alpine stage first too when we cross the border into France from Italy.They went heavy on the Alps this year. Maybe we'll see more of the Pyrenees next year.
Plateau de beille will comeback.They went heavy on the Alps this year. Maybe we'll see more of the Pyrenees next year.
Not a bad way to end the Tour.The next year's Tour will end on Côte d'Azur and profiles of last two stages are already known: multi-col stage in Maritime Alps (ending on Couillole) and 35-km hilly TT (not bad for Vinge, right?).
A start even better than the Basque start.The 2024 route so far released to public at
https://www.cyclingstage.com/tour-de-france-2024-route/
A nice stage could be something like a finish at the fort in Briancon via Pramartino, Sestriere and Montgenevre.Alps are the final block again. I guess we'll get a soft Alpine stage first too when we cross the border into France from Italy.
They went heavy on the Alps this year. Maybe we'll see more of the Pyrenees next year.
A nice stage could be something like a finish at the fort in Briancon via Pramartino, Sestriere and Montgenevre.
But I'm mostly curious about what they will do in the Alps before the last stages to Nice? I don't like stage 20, it feels more like a PN stage. I hope they will do something big, preferably with Bonette and Cayolle in the same stage.